北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 90-105.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2021.0231

• 经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

高管业绩考核制度创新是否提升了企业绩效高管业绩考核制度创新是否提升了企业绩效——来自研发投入视为利润的证据

杨兰品(1964—),女,河南汝州人,博士,教授,博士生导师   

  1. 1.武汉理工大学 经济学院,湖北 武汉430000;2.中南民族大学 经济学院,湖北 武汉 430000
  • 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-07-20
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(18BJL048)

Whether Innovation of Executive Performance Evaluation System Improves Enterprise Performance —Evidence from R&D Investment as Profit

  1. 1. Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430000, China;
    2.Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430000, China;
    3.South-Central MinzuUniversity, Wuhan 430000, China
  • Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-07-20

摘要: 以《中央企业负责人经营业绩考核暂行办法》(2010)以及各省份国资委颁布的相关文件中将研发投入视为利润为切入点,考察其对经济附加值(economic value added,EVA)的影响。以此为准自然实验,选用多期双重差分进行验证,结果表明:第一,研发投入视为利润考核政策显著提升国有企业绩效,经过一系列检验结果依旧稳健,其中高管薪酬激励起着中介作用;第二,分组检验发现,相比于非竞争性国有企业,竞争性国有企业业绩的提升效果更为明显;第三,资本密集型国有企业对于研发投入视为利润考核政策更敏感。研究结论为继续推动研发投入视为利润考核政策提供理论支撑。

关键词:  , 业绩考核;“研发投入视为利润”政策;高管激励;双重差分 

Abstract: Executive performance evaluationis an important system to optimize the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. “R&D investment as profit”, this innovation of executive performance evaluation system, is of great significance to the high-quality development of state-owned enterprises.“R&D investment as profit” in the Assessment Measuresis taken as the entry point to investigate its impact on Economic Value Added (EVA).Based on this, time-varying difference in differences (DID) method is used to test the quasi-experiment.The results show that: (1) The evaluation systemof “R&D investment as profit” significantly improves the performance of state-owned enterprises, and the results are still stable after a series of tests, among which executive compensation incentive plays a mediating role;(2) Compared with non-competitive state-owned enterprises, performance improvement of competitive state-owned enterprises is more obvious. Capital-intensive state-owned enterprises are more sensitive to the “R&D investment as profit” evaluation system. The conclusion can provide theoretical support for the continued promotion of “R&D investment as profit” evaluation system.

Key words: performance evaluation, “R&D investment as profit” system, executive incentive, difference in differences

中图分类号: