北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 34-38.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

探析我国P2P间接侵权认定规则

  

  1. 工业和信息化部 通信知识产权中心,北京100191
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-12 出版日期:2010-12-30 发布日期:2010-12-30

Exploration of the Indirect Copyright Infringement Confirmative Rules of P2P

  1. IPC of Telecom of MIIT, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2010-09-12 Online:2010-12-30 Published:2010-12-30

摘要:

P2P技术在提高信息共享效率,改变人们生活的同时,也引发了严重的版权侵权问题。由于P2P是具有双重用途的技术,所以在认定网络服务提供商和软件提供商间接侵权责任时,既要考虑保护版权人的利益,也要考虑到技术的发展。本文通过对比美国、澳大利亚的帮助侵权、引诱侵权和许可侵权认定规则,提出构建以共同侵权为基础的间接侵权认定规则的必要性。

关键词: P2P技术, 间接侵权, 帮助侵权, 引诱侵权, 许可侵权

Abstract:

The P2P technology not only increases the efficiency of information transmission and change people’s way of life, but also causes severe copyright infringement issues To accuse software and Internet service providers of the secondary infringement is more effective than accuse terminal users of primary infringement The Chinese copyright law has not introduced the doctrine of secondary liability, so it is very necessary to borrow the doctrine of secondary infringement relating to P2P from America and Australia, which have already formed mature theory of secondary infringement, construct the indirect copyright infringement confirmative rules, and at the same time, balance the relationship between copyright protection and the development P2P technology

Key words: Peer-to-Peer technology, indirect copyright infringement, contributory infringement, temp infringement, license tort

中图分类号: