Under the continuous development of artificial intelligence (AI), journalists have started utilizing AI to assist in news creation. However, the potential challenges to copyright compliance arise simultaneously. By analyzing AI involvement in news creation, compliance risks can be identified with regard to data sources, creation processes, distinction from AI autonomous creation, and creation forms. According to these issues, the following measures can be taken: promoting the “Creative Commons Agreement”, adopting the collective management system of copyright to facilitate the use of prior works, enhancing algorithmic filtering and content identification obligations, as well as incorporating the utilization of AI-generated content into the scope of fair use interpretation.

For emerging technologies that have the ability of self-learning, self-thinking and self-decision- making such as generative artificial intelligence, anti-monopoly should shift from monopoly behavior regulation to monopoly risk governance. Because of the dual technical nature of both consuming products and technical models, generative artificial intelligence can not only monopolize data, build competition barriers and exploit consumers with its independent consciousness, but also continue to enable tech giants as controllers of generative artificial intelligence to consolidate monopoly status and implement monopoly behaviors. It has predictable monopoly risk on the dimensions of technology and application. In this regard, anti-monopoly should adhere to the scenario-based management of two-dimensional monopoly risk on the basis of maintaining and improving competitiveness of the market. For generative artificial intelligence itself, through learning from the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, monopoly risk can be categorized and classified according to the operational mechanism of generative artificial intelligence. For generative artificial intelligence controllers, targeted scientific governance paths should be built in the light of prior compliance governance, in-process governance and post-regulation. In general, it is necessary to strengthen the anti-monopoly penetrated regulation on the technology and the entity.

Although legal algorithmization is closely related to the concept of trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI), it cannot achieve the credibility of algorithms, and it needs to be combined with digital human rights to jointly solve the problem of algorithmic trust. The existing criticism does not recognize the rationality of legal algorithmization and the inherent quality of law’s pursuit of stability, but only questions the theoretical significance of legal algorithmization from the perspective of legal value. Legal algorithmization realizes that external supervision alone cannot reduce the risk of algorithms, and attempts to control algorithm activities by integrating the law into algorithms to achieve the credibility of algorithms. However, legal algorithmization mistakenly believes that algorithmic trust dilemma only stems from the technical risks of algorithms, and ignores that the emergence of algorithmic trust dilemma is closely related to opacity and imbalance of benefit risk distribution. The immateriality of algorithms also deepens the trust crisis of algorithms. From the perspective of overcoming the trust crisis in algorithms, legal algorithmization should keep enough restraint, develop more legal risk prevention technologies, and less interfere in the distribution of rights and obligations. With the cooperation of digital human rights, legal algorithmization can be turned into an opportunity to develop the cooperative governance model of algorithms, in which legal algorithmization should be optimized.

In recent years, exclusive copyright agreements by digital platforms have repeatedly touched on the issue of monopoly. However, under the premise that the copyright law does not restrict the proprietary license, the traditional anti-monopoly supervision may have some problems such as poor post-supervision effect and insufficient incentive for self-compliance of digital platform enterprises, and it is unable to achieve the platform anti-monopoly goal of “regulation and development”. It is urgent to introduce a new governance model to change the governance concept and governance means. Different from the traditional anti-monopoly model, the public-private partnership governance model emphasizes multi-subject, multi-means, and full-chain regulation before and after the event. In order to deal with the public risk of exclusive copyright agreements of digital platforms, measures should be taken as follows. In terms of governance basis, expand the scope of legal license and limit the term of exclusive license; in terms of supervision means, construct full-chain regulation mode of presupervision by industry associations and post-supervision by anti-monopoly organizations, and regulate exclusive copyright agreements of digital platforms; in terms of governance measures, add anti-monopoly compliance statutory liability exemption, create legal defense of digital platform exclusive copyright agreements, and cultivate an incentive mechanism for digital platform exclusive copyright agreement compliance.

Digital technology plays an important supporting role in the legislative stages such as legal opinion collection, regulatory document filing and review, and post-legislative evaluation. However, empowering local legislation by digital technology also faces potential social risks that cannot be ignored, such as the lack of effective legal regulations and the lack of legal basis for the development and application of artificial intelligence technology in legislation; easy to cause new social injustice in legislation, widening the digital divide; causing technological alienation and subjecting people to machines. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the supporting status of digital technology, promote the transparency of legislative algorithms, strengthen ethical regulations of digital technology, eliminate the use of digital technology that goes against ethics, so that digital technology can better serve local legislation, improve the quality of local legislation, and promote the healthy development of local social economy.

The emergence of the "First Metaverse Arbitration Case" signifies that commercial arbitration has entered a new era. Looking back at the century long development history of commercial arbitration, it has gradually been applied to the commercial field from the initial temporary dispute resolution between neighbors, and has become one of the most popular mechanisms for commercial dispute resolution, in which technology plays an important driving role. As a virtual space that integrates internet technologies such as blockchain, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things, the metaverse has a profound and disruptive impact on the current commercial arbitration system in terms of the legality and adaptability of program startup, operation, and termination. On the one hand, conventional issues such as foreign-related determination, legal application, and arbitrability scope in international commercial arbitration are magnified in the virtual environment; On the other hand, new issues such as obstructed identification of various parties involved in metaverse arbitration and a lack of legal support for automatic execution procedures are constantly emerging, which have had an impact on the existing commercial arbitration system. To address the multiple challenges brought by metaverse technology, commercial arbitration needs to adhere to the dialectical unity of integrity and innovation. Firmly grasp the "genetic code" that has been passed down to this day, and integrate practical experiences such as humanistic concepts and rule dissemination into the construction process of the metaverse arbitration mechanism; At the same time, we will leverage the flexible, autonomous, and proactive institutional functions of commercial arbitration in diverse dispute resolution mechanisms, using small-scale cases as pilot projects, digital justice as requirements, and linkage mechanisms as guarantees, continuously seeking institutional and technological innovation, and thus completing the self innovation and era revolution of commercial arbitration in the metaverse era.

Pre-made dishes industry, as an important area which promotes the high-quality development of rural industry is highly concerned by the Party and the state. Ensuring food safety of pre-made dishes is related to the core interests of people’s lives and health. However, along with the booming development of the industry, food safety of pre-made dishes has also exposed the problems of unclear standard system, the incomplete certification system, flaws in the traceability system, and faults in the regulatory system. Based on the empirical investigation of China’s central and local normative legal documents about food safety, the realistic dilemma of food safety of pre-made dishes is clarified, and from the macro, meso and micro perspectives, the path of law guarantees for ensuring food safety of pre-made dishes is stated. Rules of law on clarifying food safety standard system, completing food safety certification system, optimizing food safety traceability system, and improving food safety supervision system should be established.

Under the wave of the digital economy and the accelerated iteration of digital technology, optimizing resource allocation through external cooperation is an important strategic behavior for enterprises to enhance their competitive advantages. Based on the theory of dynamic capabilities, the relationship between digital transformation and strategic alliances is studied by using the data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2022. The study has found that digital transformation can significantly increase the possibility of enterprises’ establishing strategic alliances, among which the promotion effect of underlying digital technology is more significant than the application of technology; the dynamic capabilities of enterprises in the dimensions of absorption, adaptation, and innovation play a mediating role between digital transformation and strategic alliances. Heterogeneity analysis has shown that this promotion effect is more significant for non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises in the central region, and capital-intensive enterprises. The research conclusions reveal the impact and mechanism of enterprises’ digital transformation on their external cooperation, and provide theoretical guidance for enterprises’ digital transformation.

Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, put forward the new judgement and new requirement of “Three Musts”, and its ideological connotation inherits consistent historical logic and major theoretical innovation of Mao Zedong’s “Two Musts” ruling theme. 2024 the Party discipline learning and education carried out in the whole Party is the Party’s further deepening self-revolution, seizing the initiative in history, and promoting full and rigorous governance over the Party. It is also of vital importance to keep the CPC’s original aspiration and mission firmly in mind and closely connect with people, and reflects Chinese Communists’ political steadfastness and the original aspiration and mission in the new era. To understand the historical generation from “Two Musts” to “Three Musts”, it is necessary to analyze the situation and the task, clarify its development, grasp its connotation, and understand its practical direction.

As an emerging technology paradigm in the era of intelligent media, algorithmic recommendation has reshaped the practice of mainstream ideology with its unique operational mechanisms. At present, the algorithmic recommendation is widely embedded in the circulation field of information production, distribution, exchange and consumption, and it unfolds the logic of “covering” the mainstream ideology by hiding ideological attributes, being saturated with traffic capital logic, subverting interpersonal connectivity mechanisms, and altering the patterns of information acquisition. This results in multi-dimensional forms of “covering” characterized by spatiality, subjectivity, narrative, and valuation. To address these challenges, efforts should be made towards technical “goodness”, narrative “upgrading”, subject “boundary-breaking” and value “guarding”, and a diversified co-construction approach should be adopted to enhance the transmission, empathy, cohesion, and leadership of mainstream ideology, so as to guarantee its security.

The team of homeroom teachers has become an important force in ideological and political work in universities, and its construction is an important component of implementing the long-term mechanism of “three comprehensive education”. On the basis of summarizing relevant domestic research, the current working situation of homeroom teachers is explored and suggestions from teachers and students on the construction of homeroom teacher teams are collected through questionnaire surveys. At present, the homeroom teacher system has played an important role in improving the effect of students’ ideological work, but there are also some urgent problems that need to be solved, such as unreasonable personnel structure and uneven personnel quality; unclear role positioning and poor collaboration with counselors; incomplete training system which is unable to meet work needs; imperfect incentive mechanism which reduces work enthusiasm. Therefore, it is suggested that universities should pay more attention to the construction of the homeroom teacher teams, and comprehensively improve the quality and work effects of the homeroom teacher teams by establishing and improving relevant systems such as appointment, assessment, training, motivation, and exit.