高技术产业创新效率省际差异与空间收敛检验——基于两阶段DEA的实证分析

北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 78-86.

高技术产业创新效率省际差异与空间收敛检验——基于两阶段DEA的实证分析

福建师范大学经济学院，福建福州350000

收稿日期:2015-11-28 出版日期:2016-02-28

Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of Innovation Efficiency #br# of China’s Hightech Industry#br# ——Based on Shared Inputs Twostage DEA

School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350000, China

Received:2015-11-28 Online:2016-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

将技术创新过程分解为技术开发阶段和技术转化阶段，应用两阶段DEA模型，测算2000—2013年我国各省高技术产业技术开发效率、技术转化效率以及整体创新效率，并检验我国高技术产业技术开发效率、技术转化效率以及整体创新效率的收敛趋势。研究结果表明，我国各省高技术产业技术开发效率、技术转化效率以及整体创新效率差异明显，经济落后省份技术开发效率要明显高于整体创新效率，技术转化效率则小于整体创新效率，而经济发达的省份则相反；收敛检验结果表明，中部地区高技术产业技术开发效率、技术转化效率及整体创新效率均出现明显的收敛趋势，而东部地区高技术产业技术开发效率、技术转化效率虽然出现收敛，但显著性水平较低，西部以及全国无论是技术开发效率、技术转化效率，还是整体创新效率收敛态势均未形成。上述研究结论政策启示明显，中央政府应针对不同区域不同省份高技术产业特征，采取差异化的扶持政策；而地方政府应结合自身实际情况，在高技术产业技术创新不同阶段采取有针对性的鼓励政策。

关键词: 高技术产业, 创新效率, 空间收敛, 两阶段DEA

Abstract:

Technical innovation process is divided into technical development stage and technical transformation stage in this paper By using the shared inputs twostage DEA model, the technical development efficiency, the technical transformation efficiency and the overall innovation efficiency of the hightech industry in China’s provinces from the year of 2000 to 2013 are measured and their spatial convergence trends are also tested The result shows the differences among provinces are obvious The technical development efficiency in the less developed provinces is obviously higher than the overall innovation efficiency and the technical transformation efficiency is lower than the overall innovation efficiency while the result is opposite in the developed provinces The technical development efficiency, the technical transformation efficiency and the overall innovation efficiency in the central region show obvious convergence trend Although the technical development efficiency and the technical transformation efficiency of the eastern region show convergence, the level of significance is low The technical development efficiency, the technical transformation efficiency and the overall innovation efficiency in the western region, even in the whole China, don’t form a convergence trend The above conclusions imply that the central government should consider the characteristics of high technology industry in different regions and provinces to take different supporting policies; and the local government should combine with their own situation, and take targeted incentives in different stages of technical innovation in hightech industry

Key words: hightech industry, innovation efficiency, spatial convergence, shared inputs twostage DEA

中图分类号:

F1243

许霞. 高技术产业创新效率省际差异与空间收敛检验——基于两阶段DEA的实证分析[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2016, 18(1): 78-86.

XU Xia. Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of Innovation Efficiency #br# of China’s Hightech Industry#br# ——Based on Shared Inputs Twostage DEA[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2016, 18(1): 78-86.

参考文献

［1］朱有为, 徐康宁. 中国高技术产业研发效率的实证研究［J］. 中国工业经济, 2006(11): 3845.
［2］王军, 杨惠馨. 2006—2008 年中国省际高技术产业效率实证研究［J］. 统计研究, 2010, 27(12): 4650.
［3］ Feng Feng, Wang Bo, Zou Yuanyuan, et al. A new internet DEA structure: measurement of Chinese R&D innovation efficiency in high technology industry［J］. International Journal of Business and Management, 2013, 8(21): 3240.
［4］鲁炜, 严夏. 高技术产业Ｒ＆Ｄ全要素生产率变动分析——基于DEA模型的Malmquist指数方法［J］. 西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）, 2012, 12(3): 5156.
［5］杨青峰. 高技术产业地区研发创新效率的决定因素——基于随机前沿模型的实证分析［J］. 管理评论, 2013, 25(6): 4758.
［6］ Xu Lixin, Cheng Min. A study on Chinese regional scientific innovation efficiency with a perspective of synergy degree［J］. Technology and Investment, 2013, 4(4): 229235.
［7］ Niu Dandan, Wang Renwen, Zhang Xinyue, et al. Comparative studies on efficiency of china’s regional innovation system on the basis of cooperation measurement model［J］. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 2013, 4(2): 147157.
［8］ Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach［J］. Economics Letters, 2006(50): 6570.
［9］ Liu J S, Lu Wenxin. Networkbased method for ranking of efficient units in twostage DEA models［J］. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2012, 63(8): 11531164.
［10］ Chen Yao, Du Juan, Sherman H D, et al. DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1): 339349.
［11］ Chen C M. A networkDEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks［J］. European Journal of Operation Researches, 2009, 32(5): 687699.
［12］ Kao C, Wang S N. Efficiency decomposition in twostage data envelopment analysis: application onlife insurance companies in Taiwan［J］. European Journal of Operation Researches, 2008, 10(6): 418429.
［13］黄薇. 中国保险机构资金运用效率研究: 基于资源型两阶段DEA模型［J］. 经济研究, 2009, 44(8): 3749.
［14］陈凯华, 官建成. 共享投入型关联两阶段生产系统的网络DEA效率测度与分解［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(7): 12111221.
［15］ Guan Jiancheng, Chen Kaihua. Measuring the innovation production process: a crossregion empirical study of China’s hightech innovations［J］. Technovation, 2010, 41(30): 348358.
［16］叶锐, 杨建飞, 常云昆. 中国省际高技术产业效率测度与分解——基于共享投入关联DEA模型［J］. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012(7): 317.
［17］ Chen C P, Hu Jinli, Yang Chihai. An international comparison of R&D efficiency of multiple innovative outputs: the role of the national innovation system［J］. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 2011, 13(3): 341360.
［18］ Lu Zhiying, Xia Yanmei. Innovation efficiency and impact factors of china’s strategic emerging industries［J］. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 2012, 3(5): 547552.
［19］刘志迎, 叶蓁, 孟令杰. 我国高技术产业技术效率的实证分析［J］. 中国软科学, 2007(5): 139143。
［20］吉生保, 周小柯. 基于三阶段DEA模型的中国高技术产业效率研究［J］. 中央财经大学学报, 2010(12): 6266.
［21］ Michael S, Delgado L. Productivity in China’s the hightech industry: regional heterogeneity and R&D［J］. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2012， 83(79): 127141.

[1]	魏龙, 张虎. 环境规制对绿色技术创新效率：促进还是抑制？——基于创新价值链和空间外溢的双重视角[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 48-58.
[2]	张旺，刘平峰，周鑫. 基于技术成就指数城市创新能力系统协同度研究——以北京市为例[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(3): 62-70.
[3]	刘树林，陈静. 政府补贴对我国新能源企业创新效率的影响 ——基于随机前沿模型的实证分析[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(3): 52-61.
[4]	郑丽升1,李若曦2. 技术创新投入对高技术产业TFP增长的影响研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(2): 60-67.
[5]	王云航，彭定贇. 创新驱动视角下高技术产业对经济增长的影响研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(1): 38-47.
[6]	胡苏敏. 企业文化对技术创新的影响——基于文化强度视角[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2018, 20(6): 42-51.
[7]	赵玉林，姚洁. 高技术产业带动产业升级：增长还是创新？[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2018, 20(5): 41-51.
[8]	郝金磊，姜诗尧. 基于三阶段DEA模型的西部地区高新技术企业创新效率研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2016, 18(3): 71-76.
[9]	邹文杰1，张文刚2. 北京高技术产业研发转化效率实证研究——基于随机前沿生产函数的分析[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2012, 14(6): 96-100.
[10]	张本照，杨雪. 基于改进DEA的我国传统产业技术创新效率研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2008, 10(5): 52-56.