北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 43-49.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

民事司法中利益衡量论的引入和规制

  

  1. 中共盐城市委党校,江苏 盐城224007
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-16 出版日期:2018-02-28

Introduction and Regulation of Balance of Interests in Civil Justice

  1. Party School of Yancheng Municipal Committee of the CPC, Yancheng 224007, China
  • Received:2017-11-16 Online:2018-02-28

摘要: 日本利益衡量论的思想基础起源于德国自由法学及利益法学并深受美国现实主义法学的影响,加之其特殊的背景,最后形成了完全不同于利益法学派所主张的利益衡量。我国的司法实践在缺乏类似背景的情况下,应对利益衡量进行必要规制。利益衡量是否已成为一种独立的法律适用方法以及属于何种法律适用方法?应如何规制法官在司法实践中对利益衡量的运用?前者属于利益衡量的方法论类型归属问题,从法解释学的整体角度等出发,利益衡量应属于法律漏洞的补充方法之一;对于后者,应从适用范围、适用顺序以及适用规则三个方面考虑,对其进行规制。

关键词: 利益衡量, 法律方法, 法律漏洞, 规制

Abstract:  The ideologic basis of the Japanese balance of interests originated from German free law and jurisprudence of interests, and was deeply influenced by American legal realism Coupled with its special background, Japanese balance of interests has formed a theory completely different from the one proposed by jurisprudence of interests Devoid of similar background, China should set necessary regulations on balance of interests in judicial practice Is it an independent method of law application, or which method of law does it belong to? How to regulate the judge in judicial practice in the use of balance of interests? From the holistic point of view, the former belongs to the issue of attribution types—one of the compensation processes of legal loophole; for the latter, it should be regulated from three aspects: the applicable scope, applicable order and applicable rules

Key words:  balance of interests, legal method, legal loophole, rules and regulations

中图分类号: