Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters)

• 法学辨析 • 上一篇    

分权制衡:从两起典型案例解析美国最高法院司法权的政治性

张杰   

  1. 中央民族大学 法学院
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-04-30

Separationofpowersandchecksandbalances:onthepoilticalattributeofAmericanSupremeCourt’sjudicialpower

ZHANG Jie   

  1. Law School, Minzu University of China
  • Received:2009-02-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-04-30

摘要: 无论何种形式的司法权,都是在一定的政治架构下进行的制度配置,从这个意义上说,司法权都具有相应的政治性。美国是典型的分权制国家,司法系统是当今美国社会的重要权力中心之一。本文通过两个典型案件的对比揭示了美国最高法院司法权的政治性,并结合美国的分权体制、联邦法官的选择程序及其他政治因素分析了这种司法政治的成因。在美国那种极为敏感的多元主义政治模式下,美国法院系统决不可能超然于政治系统之外。

关键词: 马伯里诉麦迪逊案, 美国诉尼克松案, 司法政治, 分权与制衡

Abstract: Any kind of judicial power is an allocation of institution within a certain political frame In this sense, the judicial power has its political attribute The United States of America is a typical country based on separation of powers Judiciary is one of the important power branches in American Society This article reveals the political attribute of American Supreme Court’s judicial power through two typical cases It also analyses the causes of judicial politics connecting with the system of separation of powers, the election process of Federal Court’s judges and other political elements American judiciary cannot detach itself from the political system within the sensitive political model of pluralism

Key words: MarburyvMadison, UnitedStatesvNixon, judicialpolitics, separationofpowersandchecksandbalances

中图分类号: