北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 111-118.

• 教育研究 • 上一篇    

计算机中介写作同伴互评的 对比研究

  

  1. 北京邮电大学 人文学院,北京100876
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-06 出版日期:2015-06-30 发布日期:2023-03-27

Comparison of the Efficacy of Computer-mediated Peer Review

  1. School of Humanities, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • Received:2015-03-06 Online:2015-06-30 Published:2023-03-27

摘要: 同伴互评是写作教学和研究中的一大热点,而互评中介对于同伴互评的质量 和效果有着重要影响。通过一项为期一学期的计算机中介写作同伴互评活动,对以 Microsoft Word和博客为中介的同伴互评进行了对比研究。研究发现,学生对于基 于计算机中介的写作互评活动普遍持积极态度,但相对而言,学生更喜欢Microsoft Word中介环境下的同伴互评活动,互评评语的质量和数量也要高于博客中介互评。 整体上,博客中介互评更具有开放性、互动性和交际性,而Microsoft Word中介互 评则更具私密性、针对性和有效性。

关键词: 计算机辅助教学, 英语写作, 同伴互评, 计算机中介

Abstract: This study reported findings from a comparative study on the efficacy of using Microsoft word and blogs for peer review in undergraduate EFL speech writing in China Multiple data and research methods were used to explore the dynamics of CMC peer review and the difference in the effect between the two modes of peer review Results showed students generally held very positive attitude towards CMC peer review Using Microsoft word generates more effective peer feedback than blog-based peer review but blog-based peer review is more interactive This study will provide useful insights to researchers and educators on CALL studies

Key words: CALL, EFL/ESL writing, peer review, computer-mediated communication

中图分类号: