基于PSM-DID模型的上市公司并购创新绩效研究

doi:10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2018.0113

北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 69-79.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2018.0113

基于PSM-DID模型的上市公司并购创新绩效研究

武汉理工大学经济学院，湖北武汉430070

收稿日期:2018-05-21 出版日期:2018-10-31

Innovation Performance of Listed Company M&As: Empirical Research #br# Based on PSM-DID Model

School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2018-05-21 Online:2018-10-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将2006—2016年中国制造业1232家上市企业分为未发生并购的企业、非技术并购企业和技术并购企业，采用非经典PSM-DID（Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences）模型，交叉比较了三者并购前后技术创新绩效的变化。研究表明，非技术并购不能提升企业技术创新绩效，技术并购可以提升企业技术创新绩效的原假设也不成立；但企业可以通过加密加深与目标企业的经济联系，以及通过扩大自身的知识宽度来减弱这种负向效应。本研究区分了技术并购与非技术并购对企业技术创新绩效影响机理的差异，分析了主并方创新能力和属性特点对创新产出的作用效果，为企业可持续的利润最大化提供了有效途径。

关键词: 并购, 技术并购, 知识基础, 创新绩效

Abstract: The effect of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) on technological innovation performance has not reached a conclusion. 1232 listed companies in China′s manufacturing industry from 2006 to 2016 were divided into three groups: never merged before, non-technological M&As and technological M&As. Then, the non-classical PSM-DID（Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences） model is adopted to analyze the path and effect of three groups on the technological innovation performance. The result shows that non-technological M&As cannot improve enterprise′s technological innovation performance. The hypothesis that technological merger and acquisition can improve enterprise′s technological innovation performance is not tenable either. Despite of that, enterprises can weaken this negative effect by deepening economic ties with target companies and expanding their knowledge breadth. This study distinguishes the differences in the mechanism of technological innovation performance between technological and non-technological M&As and analyzes the main effects of innovation capabilities and acquirers′ characteristics on innovation output, providing effective ways to enterprises′ sustainable profit maximization.

Key words: acquisitions, technological acquisitions, knowledge base, innovation performance

中图分类号:

F273.1
F426

陆文琪. 基于PSM-DID模型的上市公司并购创新绩效研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2018, 20(5): 69-79.

LU Wen-qi. Innovation Performance of Listed Company M&As: Empirical Research #br# Based on PSM-DID Model[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2018, 20(5): 69-79.

参考文献

［1］唐清泉, 巫岑. 基于协同效应的企业内外部R&D与创新绩效研究［J］. 管理科学, 2014, 27(5): 12-23.
［2］胡雪峰, 吴晓明. 并购、吸收能力与企业创新绩效——基于我国医药上市公司数据的实证分析［J］. 江苏社会科学, 2015（2）: 25-32.
［3］ BERTRAND O, BETSCHINGER M A. Performance of domestic and cross-border acquisitions: empirical evidence from Russian acquirers［J］. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2012, 40(3): 413-437.
［4］韩俊华, 王宏昌, 刘博. 技术并购、整合与创新研究［J］. 科学管理研究, 2018(1): 57-60.
［5］ KING D R, DALTON D R, DAILY C M, et al. Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderatores［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(2): 186-200.
［6］ DESYLLAS P, HUGHES A. Do high technology acquirers become more innovative?［J］. Research Policy, 2010, 39(8): 1105-1121.
［7］周城雄, 赵兰香, 李美桂. 中国企业创新与并购关系的实证分析——基于34个行业2436个上市公司的实证分析［J］. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(10): 1570-1575.
［8］韩宝山. 技术并购与创新: 文献综述及研究展望［J］. 经济管理, 2017(9): 195-208.
［9］ CASSIMAN B, COLOMOBO M, GARRONE P, et al. The impact of M&A on the R&D process——an empirical analysis of the role of technological and market relatedness［J］. Research Policy, 2005, 34(2): 192-220.
［10］郝清民, 任欢欢. 技术并购与研发的创新演进绩效研究［J］. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(16): 63-68.
［11］陈岩, 翟瑞瑞, 姜鹏飞. 研发方式组合与吸收能力的匹配对企业创新绩效的影响［J］. 中国科技论坛, 2015(7): 34-39.
［12］蔡虹, 刘岩, 向希尧. 企业知识基础对技术合作的影响研究［J］. 管理学报, 2013, 10(6): 875-881+889.
［13］ EDAMURA K, HANEDA S, INUI T, et al. Impact of Chinese cross-border outbound M&As on firm performance: econometric analysis using firm-level data［J］. China Economic Review, 2014(30): 169-179.
［14］ ZHU H, QI Z. Mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms: a review and comparison with other mergers and acquisitions research in the leading journals［J］. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, 33(4): 1107-1149.
［15］朱治理, 温军, 李晋. 海外并购、文化距离与技术创新［J］. 当代经济科学, 2016(2): 79-86+127.
［16］ ORNAGHI C. Mergers and innovation in big pharma［J］. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2009, 27(1): 70-79.
［17］ BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States［J］. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667.
［18］ CHESBROUG H W. Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology［M］. Harvard Business School Press, 2006: 43-63.
［19］张峥, 聂思. 中国制造业上市公司并购创新绩效研究［J］. 科研管理, 2016(4): 36-43.
［20］于飞, 蔡翔, 董亮. 研发模式对企业创新的影响——知识基础的调节作用［J］. 管理科学, 2017, 30(3): 97-109.
［21］ LEVINTHAL D A, MARCH J G. The myopia of learning［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(2): 95-112.
［22］ KING D R, DALTON D R, DAILY C, et al. Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 25(2): 187-200.

[1]	王疆,黄嘉怡. 跨国并购动因、吸收能力与企业创新绩效[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(2): 84-91.
[2]	李吉音. 市场导向、价值共创与创新绩效研究——制度环境的调节作用[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2017, 19(4): 51-57.
[3]	茶洪旺，蔡高楼. 基于DEA方法的中国大数据企业创新绩效评价研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2017, 19(1): 71-78.
[4]	金永生，季桓永. 企业网络能力与网络外溢的调节作用[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2015, 17(6): 64-69.
[5]	赵保国1，李卫卫2，王妲1. 中国移动港台地区及海外并购历程回顾与成败经验[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2011, 13(5): 80-83.
[6]	李霞，郭要梅，宋维维. 用户参与产品开发对技术创新绩效的影响因素实证研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2010, 12(6): 77-83.
[7]	黄攸立，陈如琳. 企业创新绩效影响因素的研究综述[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2010, 12(4): 71-77.
[8]	吴洪. 台湾的企业并购分析[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2006, 8(2): 36-40.
[9]	汪剑眉,忻展红. 全球并购风潮分析[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2002, 4(3): 5-9.

基于PSM-DID模型的上市公司并购创新绩效研究

Innovation Performance of Listed Company M&As: Empirical Research #br# Based on PSM-DID Model

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价