北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1): 35-44.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

书面契约取信制度研究——以签字、私章的取信能力为考查重点

  

  1. (1 中国政法大学 民商经济法学院,北京100088;2 内蒙古科技大学  文法学院,内蒙古  包头014010)
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-17 出版日期:2012-02-28 发布日期:2022-11-24

Research on the Trust System of Written Contract#br# ——Focus on the credit ability of signature and private seal

  1. (1 School of Civil and Commercial Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China;
    2 School of Humanities and Law, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China)
  • Received:2011-10-17 Online:2012-02-28 Published:2022-11-24

摘要:

“签字或盖章”是我国合同法所规定的书面合同取信制度,该制度未区分自然人和法人而一体规制,在实践中产生了有悖公平的不良后果。本文立基于法律史和比较法的角度,对书面合同取信制度进行了系统的梳理,总结了我国古代和国外书面合同的取信制度,在此基础上评价了我国现行合同法的相关规定。本文认为,私章自身的内在局限及签名取信的多维优势,决定了签名取代私章的必然;我国合同法应该明确规定,自然人主体书面契约的取信方式只能是签名。
   

关键词: 书面契约, 取信, 签名, 私章

Abstract:

“Signature or seal” is the trust system of written contract in Chinese Contract Law However, this system does not distinguish the essential difference between natural person and legal person, which brings the unfair consequences in practice Based on the perspectives of the legal history and comparative law, the paper makes a systematical analysis of the trust system of written contract, and summarizes the system in China’s ancient law and foreign law, based on which this paper evaluates Chinese current Contract Law It points out the signature will inevitably replace the private seal, owing to the limitations of the private seal and the multidimensional advantages of the signature The Contract Law of our country should clearly clarify that the signature would be the only trust system of natural person’s written contract

Key words: written contract, trust system, signature, private seal

中图分类号: