创新自我效能感对科研绩效的影响：科研投入与挑战性科研压力的作用

北京邮电大学学报(社科版)

创新自我效能感对科研绩效的影响：科研投入与挑战性科研压力的作用

1 中国人民大学劳动人事学院，北京100872；2 北京邮电大学人事处，北京100876

收稿日期:2015-09-07 出版日期:2016-04-30

Impact of Creative Self-efficacy on Research Performance: the Role of Research Engagement and Challenge Research Stress

1.School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;2. Department of Personnel, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Received:2015-09-07 Online:2016-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以364名高校教师为研究样本，探讨高校教师创新自我效能感对科研绩效的影响，以及科研投入和挑战性科研压力在其中的作用。研究结果表明，高校教师的创新自我效能感对科研绩效具有正向影响；挑战性科研压力对科研绩效有倒U型影响；科研投入在高校教师创新自我效能感与科研绩效的关系中起部分中介作用；挑战性科研压力对创新自我效能感与科研绩效的关系以及科研投入与科研绩效的关系均起负向调节作用。研究结论对高校的科研管理工作提供了有益启示。

关键词: 高校教师, 创新自我效能感, 科研绩效, 科研投入, 挑战性科研压力

Abstract:

Based on a sample of 364 university teachers, the research explored the impact of creative self-efficacy on university teacher’ research performance, and the role of research engagement and challenge research stress in it. The results showed that: creative self-efficacy had positive effect on research performance; challenge research stress had reversed U shape effect on research performance; research engagement played a mediating role in relationship between creative self-efficacy and research performance; challenge research stress played a moderating role in relationships between creative self-efficacy and research performance as well as research engagement and research performance. The conclusions are revealing for the scientific research management of many universitys.

Key words: font-size: 10.5pt, mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt, mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA" lang="EN-US">university teacherfont-size: 10.5pt, mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt, mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA" lang="EN-US">, creative self-efficacyfont-size: 10.5pt, mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA" lang="EN-US">, research performance, research engagement, challenge research stress

中图分类号:

G642
TP37

刘睿1，2，郭云贵1，张丽华1.

创新自我效能感对科研绩效的影响：科研投入与挑战性科研压力的作用[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版).

Liu Rui1，2, GUO Yun-gui1, Zhang Li-hua1.

Impact of Creative Self-efficacy on Research Performance: the Role of Research Engagement and Challenge Research Stress[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM.

参考文献

[1]诸葛亚寒.2014年度国家科学技术奖三大奖高校占70.9%[N].中国青年报，2015-01-10.

[2]Tierney P, Farmer S M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 1137-1148.

[3]杨晶照，杨东涛，赵顺娣等.工作场所中员工创新的内驱力：员工创新自我效能感[J].心理科学进展，2011，19(9)：1363-1370.

[4]李永周，王月，阳静宁.自我效能感、工作投入对高新技术企业研发人员工作绩效的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2015，36（2）：173-180.

[5]Fiedler F E. Cognitive resources and leadership performance[J]. Applied Psychology, 1995, 44(1): 5-28.

[6]班杜拉著，林颖等译.思想和行动的社会基础——社会认知论[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社，2001.552-553.

[7]Tierney P, Farmer S M. Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(2): 277.

[8]李剑伟.高校教师工作压力与工作绩效的相关性研究[D].燕山大学，2012.

[9]Broadhurst P L. Emotionality and the Yerkes-Dodsonlaw[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54(5):345-352.

[10]Anderson C R. Coping behaviors as intervening mechanisms in the inverted-U stress-performance relationship[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61(1):30-34.

[11]Srivastava A K, Krishna A. A test of inverted U hypothesis of stress performance relationship in the industrial context[J]. Psychological Studies, 1991,36(1), 34-38.

[12]黄海艳.绩效评价导向对研发人员的工作压力——工作绩效曲线关系的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2014，35(7)：162-170.

[13]Cavanaugh M A, Boswell W R, Roehling M V, et al. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(1):65-74.

[14]李宗波，李锐.挑战性—阻碍性压力源研究述评[J].外国经济与管理，2013，35（5）：40-59.

[15]钱伟长.大学必须拆除教学与科研之间的高墙[J].群言，2003，（10）：16-20.

[16]王仙雅，林盛，陈立芸.挑战-阻碍性科研压力源对科研绩效的作用机理——科研焦虑与成就动机的中介作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2014，35（3）：23-30.

[17]Schaufeli W B, Salanova M, González-Romá V, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach[J]. Journal of Happiness studies, 2002, 3(1): 71-92.

[18]Cotter E W, Fouad N A. Examining Burnout and Engagement in Layoff Survivors: The Role of Personal Strengths[J]. Journal of Career Development, 2012, 40(5):424-444.

[19]Ouweneel E, Schaufeli W B, Le Blanc P M. Believe, and You Will Achieve: Changes over Time in Self‐Efficacy, Engagement, and Performance[J]. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2013, 5(2): 225-247.

[20]Keller, R T. Job involvement and organizational commitment as longitudinal Predieators of job Performance: A study of scientists and engineers[J].Journal of Applied psyehology,1997, 82(4):539-545.

[21]Bakker A B, Demerouti E, Ten Brummelhuis L L. Work engagement, performance, and active learning: The role of conscientiousness[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(2):555–564.

[22]段锦云，傅强，田晓明等.情感事件理论的内容、应用及研究展望[J].心理科学进展，2011，19（4）：599-607.

[23]Gardner J W. The Nature of Leadership: Introductory Considerations[M]. Washington: Leadership Studies Program, Independent Sector, 1986.

[24]Locke E A, Frederick E, Lee C, et al. Effect of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69(2):241-251.

[25]Karwowski M, Lebuda I, Wisniewska E, et al. Big Five Personality Traits as the Predictors of Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity: Does Gender Matter?[J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2013, 47(3):215–232.

[26]Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006, 66(4):701–716.

[27]徐灵，魏彤春，侯光辉.科研压力下的高校教师学术不端行为：组织支持的调节效应[J].科技管理研究，2013，33（7）：86-91.

[28]王仙雅，林盛，陈立芸.科研压力对科研绩效的影响机制研究——学术氛围与情绪智力的调节作用[J].科学学研究，2013，31（10）：1564-1571.

[29]Preacher K J, Hayes A F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2008, 40(3):879-891.

[30]Scott, Lyle E. Leritz, Michael D. Mumford. The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review[J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2004, 16(4):361-388.

[31]Mathisen G E, Bronnick K S. Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2009, 48(1):21–29.

[32]Kahn W. A.Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1990,33(4):692-724.

[33]Saks A M. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1986, 21(7):600-619.