北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 64-75.

• 经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

融资型互联网金融平台的分类监管

  

  1. 北京邮电大学 经济管理学院,北京100876
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-07 出版日期:2017-06-30

Classification Regulation of Financing Internet Finance Platform

  1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,
    Beijing 100876, China
  • Received:2016-12-07 Online:2017-06-30

摘要: 互联网金融借助信息技术实现普惠金融,实现了对传统金融市场的有效补充。然而,融资型互联网金融平台模式多样,监管部门和理论界对其分类界定不清晰,一方面导致监管空白、P2P平台风险事件频发,另一方面造成目前针对互联网金融“一刀切”的监管现象。提出分类监管是解决目前互联网金融市场监管困境、保护消费者利益、维护金融市场稳定、鼓励互联网金融市场创新的有效措施。首先,提出应对融资型互联网金融平台实施新分类标准,并基于平台的业务实质、平台承担的违约责任和受托义务以及平台的风险特征,将融资型互联网金融划分为中介型、平台型两类机构;其次,基于金融监管理论,结合功能性监管和行为监管方法,提出对平台型、中介型的融资型互联网金融机构实施分类监管,并提出对中介型互联网金融需加强资本监管、对平台型互联网金融需加强信息披露监管等具体建议。

关键词: 融资型互联网金融, 风险, 分类, 监管

Abstract:  By virtue of information technology, internet finance achieves inclusive finance and becomes the effective supplement of traditional financial markets However, various types of financing internet finance platforms and confusion on its classification by regulators and theorists lead to regulatory gaps and many risk events caused by P2P platforms on the one hand, and on the other hand, cause ′one size fits all′ in regulation So it is proposed that classification regulation is an effective measure which can resolve the regulation problems, protect consumers′ interests, maintain financial market stability, and encourage financial innovation Firstly the new classification standard is introduced, and financial platforms are divided into mediation-type platforms and platform-type platforms according to  business, duty and risk Classification regulation should be applied to them based on financial regulatory theories It is important to implement strong capital regulations on mediation-type platforms and strong information disclosure regulations on platform-type platforms

Key words:  financing Internet finance, risk, classification, regulation

中图分类号: