基于元分析的自动驾驶技术用户采纳研究

doi:10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2020.0346

北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 1-10.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2020.0346

• 电子商务 • 下一篇

基于元分析的自动驾驶技术用户采纳研究

刘娜（1988—），女，山东潍坊人，博士，讲师

北京邮电大学经济管理学院，北京100876

收稿日期:2020-11-19 出版日期:2021-04-30 发布日期:2021-05-20
通讯作者: 刘娜（1988—），女，山东潍坊人，博士，讲师
作者简介:刘娜（1988—），女，山东潍坊人，博士，讲师
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目 (71901033)；北京市自然科学基金资助项目（9204029）

Meta-analysis on User Adoption of Automated Driving

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Received:2020-11-19 Online:2021-04-30 Published:2021-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用元分析的方法，探究影响自动驾驶技术用户采纳意愿的关键因素，并比较了各因素的影响强度。通过文献检索，得到了与自动驾驶技术用户采纳相关的27篇文献，分析后提取了12个影响自动驾驶技术用户采纳的因素。研究结果表明：态度、绩效预期、安全与自动驾驶技术用户采纳的行为意愿有强相关关系；社会影响、信任、感知有用性与自动驾驶技术用户采纳的行为意愿有中度强度的相关关系。最后总结了自动驾驶技术用户采纳意愿的影响因素理论、实践意义、不足之处，以及未来研究方向。

关键词: 自动驾驶, 技术接受, 元分析, 用户采纳

Abstract: Meta-analysis is used to investigate the critical factors that influence users willingness of adopting automated driving and compare the influencing strength of each factor. Based on literature review, a total of 27 relevant literatures were obtained and twelve factors that influence user adoption of automated driving were extracted. The results show that attitude, performance expectancy, and safety are strongly correlated with behavioral intention to adopt automated driving, while social influence, trust, perceived usefulness are moderately correlated with behavioral intention to adopt automated driving. Theoretical and practical implications of identifying the critical factors to user adoption of automated driving and directions for future research are discussed.

Key words: automated driving, technology acceptance, meta-analysis, user adoption

中图分类号:

G203
C931

刘娜, 张峻菖, 张生太, 王旭辉. 基于元分析的自动驾驶技术用户采纳研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(2): 1-10.

LIU Na, ZHANG Jun-chang, ZHANG Sheng-tai, WANG Xu-hui. Meta-analysis on User Adoption of Automated Driving[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(2): 1-10.

参考文献

［1］ ZHANG T, TAO D, QU X, et al. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles［J］. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 98: 207-220.
［2］石娟, 田晓笛, 王建培. 自动驾驶分级方法及测试技术［J］. 汽车工程师, 2018(9): 18-21.
［3］ FAGNANT D J, KOCKELMAN K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations［J］. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 77: 167-181.
［4］ SURESH P, MANIVANNAN P V. Reduction of vehicular pollution through fuel economy improvement with the use of autonomous self-driving passenger cars［J］. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 2014, 8(3): 705-716.
［5］ CLARK H, FENG J. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation［J］. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017, 106: 468-479.
［6］ LI S, BLYTHE P, GUO W, et al. Investigation of older driver's takeover performance in highly automated vehicles in adverse weather conditions［J］. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2018, 12(9): 1157-1165.
［7］ ABRAHAM H, LEE C, BRADY S, et al. Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: trust, preferences, and effects of age［C］//Proceedings of the transportation research board 96th annual meeting (TRB'17).Washington DC:2017.
［8］ LIU P, YANG R, XU Z. Public acceptance of fully automated driving: effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions［J］. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(2): 326-341.
［9］ NORDHOFF S, VAN AREM B, HAPPEE R. Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vehicles［J］. Transportation Research Record, 2016, 2602(1): 60-67.
［10］ BUCKLEY L, KAYE S-A, PRADHAN A K. Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: a simulated driving study［J］. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 115: 202-208.
［11］ BRELL T, PHILIPSEN R, ZIEFLE M. sCARy! Risk perceptions in autonomous driving: the influence of experience on perceived benefits and barriers［J］. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(2): 342-357.
［12］ PANAGIOTOPOULOS I, DIMITRAKOPOULOS G. An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving［J］. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95: 773-784.
［13］ ACHEAMPONG R A, CUGURULLO F. Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars［J］. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 62: 349-375.
［14］ LIU H, YANG R, WANG L, et al. Evaluating initial public acceptance of highly and fully autonomous vehicles［J］. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 35(11): 919-931.
［15］ JACOB D W, FUDZEE M F M, SALAMAT M A, et al. A review of the generic end-user adoption of e-government services［J］. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2019, 85(4): 799-818.
［16］ FISHBEIN M, AJZEN I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research［M］. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
［17］ AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior［J］. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
［18］ DAVIS F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology［J］. MIS Quarterly, 1989,13(3): 319-340.
［19］ VENKATESH V, MORRIS M G, DAVIS G B, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view［J］. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(3): 425-478.
［20］ ZHANG T, TAO D, QU X, et al. Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants［J］. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 112: 220-233.
［21］ GHAZIZADEH M, LEE J D, BOYLE L N. Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation［J］. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2012, 14(1): 39-49.
［22］ CHOI J K, JI Y G. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle［J］. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2015, 31(10): 692-702.
［23］ GLASS G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research［J］. Educational Researcher, 1976, 5(10): 3-8.
［24］王建亚, 牛晓蓉, 万莉. 基于元分析的在线学习用户使用行为研究［J］. 现代情报, 2020, 40(1): 58-68.
［25］吴江, 曾敏讷, 刘福珍, 等. 基于元分析方法的可穿戴设备用户采纳行为研究［J］. 信息资源管理学报, 2017, 7(2): 5-13.
［26］邓朝华, 张亮, 张金隆. 基于荟萃分析方法的移动商务用户采纳研究［J］. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(18): 137-143.
［27］杨润. 高度自动与完全自动驾驶汽车的公众接受度研究［D］. 天津：天津大学, 2018.
［28］黄位. 基于计划行为理论与技术接受模型的自动驾驶汽车接受度研究［D］. 江苏：江苏大学, 2019.
［29］魏潇潇, 钟石泉. 基于 TAM 与认知理论的无人驾驶汽车接受度研究［J］. 综合运输, 2019(11): 79-84.
［30］陈坚, 李睿, 傅志妍. 基于 UTAUT 的无人驾驶公交乘客接受度模型［J］. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6): 38-44.
［31］ ZOELLICK J C, KUHLMEY A, SCHENK L, et al. Amused, accepted, and used? Attitudes and emotions towards automated vehicles, their relationships, and predictive value for usage intention［J］. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 65: 68-78.
［32］ SENER I N, ZMUD J, WILLIAMS T. Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: a case study of Texas cities［J］. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 62: 66-77.
［33］ DAVENPORT E C, DAVISON M L, LIOU P Y, et al. Reliability, dimensionality, and internal consistency as defined by Cronbach: distinct albeit related concepts［J］. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2015, 34(4): 4-9.
［34］ COHEN J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences［M］. Cambrideg,Massachusetts:Academic Press, 2013:1-567.
［35］ PADEN B, CAP M, YONG S Z, et al. A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles［J］. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2016, 1(1): 33-55.
［36］ KYRIAKIDIS M, HAPPEE R, DE WINTER J C F. Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents［J］. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 32: 127-140.
［37］ DWIVEDI Y K, RANA N P, JEYARAJ A, et al. Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): towards a revised theoretical model［J］. Information Systems Frontiers, 2019, 21(3): 719-734.
［38］ SHIN D, KIM B, YI K, et al. Human-centered risk assessment of an automated vehicle using vehicular wireless communication［J］. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 20(2): 667-681.
［39］ MONTORO L, USECHE S A, ALONSO F, et al. Perceived safety and attributed value as predictors of the intention to use autonomous vehicles: a national study with Spanish drivers［J］. Safety Science, 2019, 120: 865-876.
［40］ HOGG M A. Social Identity Theory［M］. Berlin:Germany, 2016: 3-17.
［41］ GURSOY D, DEL CHIAPPA G, ZHANG Y. Preferences regarding external information sources: a conjoint analysis of visitors to Sardinia, Italy［J］. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2017, 34(6): 806-820.
［42］ JEON M M, LEE S, JEONG M. e-Social influence and customers’ behavioral intentions on a bed and breakfast website［J］. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 2018, 27(3): 366-385.
［43］ PARASURAMAN R, RILEY V. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse［J］. Human Factors, 1997, 39(2): 230-253.
［44］ HOFF K A, BASHIR M. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust［J］. Human Factors, 2015, 57(3): 407-434.

[1]	胡春，王颂，吕亮. 高校同步网络混合教学模式学生参与度研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(3): 113-120.
[2]	胡春，王路远. 共享服务消费者参与意愿影响因素研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2018, 20(2): 10-17.
[3]	赵欢欢，李青. 创新教学法在教育中的应用和启示研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2017, 19(3): 100-107.
[4]	胡雪原，王宁，杨学成. 基于消费者互动视角的朋友圈广告接受度研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2017, 19(1): 37-43.
[5]	赵保国，冀美杉. 线上限时抢购中消费者购买意愿影响因素研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2014, 16(2): 37-43.
[6]	宁连举，张爱欢. 虚拟社区网络团购消费者使用意向影响因素研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2014, 16(1): 43-50.
[7]	金永生，陈博. 基于网络用户体验的客户分类及行为预测[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2013, 15(2): 39-46.
[8]	邹梦碧, 陈文晶. 网络购买“意向—行为”过程及影响因素研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2012, 14(3): 59-64.
[9]	廖泽俊，柏琳. 基于TAM的大学生微博使用影响因素实证研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2012, 14(2): 8-.
[10]	张志杰，吕廷杰. 移动LBS用户接受模型的实证研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2012, 14(1): 56-61.
[11]	黄攸立，陈如琳. 企业创新绩效影响因素的研究综述[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2010, 12(4): 71-77.
[12]	杨苏丹，胡春. 移动即时通信用户接受模型的实证研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2009, 11(1): 33-40.
[13]	刘冰，金永生. 移动商务驱动因素的研究方法述评[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2008, 10(5): 6-11.

基于元分析的自动驾驶技术用户采纳研究

Meta-analysis on User Adoption of Automated Driving

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价