北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 23-30.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2022.0110

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

日本双重代表诉讼制度对我国的启示——兼评《公司法(修订草案)》第188条之规定

李秀文(1980—),女,福建长乐人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师   

  1. 福州大学 法学院
  • 出版日期:2023-04-30 发布日期:2023-05-09
  • 作者简介:李秀文(1980—),女,福建长乐人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(18YJC820040);福建省社科规划项目(FJ2020B016)

Implications of Japanese Dual Representative Litigation for China—Reviews on Provisions of Article 188 of the Company Law (Revised Draft) 

  1. School of Law, Fuzhou University
  • Online:2023-04-30 Published:2023-05-09

摘要:  在母子公司中,当子公司发生违法行为而母、子公司均怠于提起诉讼时,母公司股东难以维护自身的合法权益。根据最新出台的《中华人民共和国公司法(修订草案)》(二次审议稿)第188条规定,允许全资母子公司中的母公司股东通过追究子公司董事、监事、高级管理人员等违法行为责任以实现损害救济,但该条文内容过于笼统和狭隘。在今后的立法中还需对双重代表诉讼制度中母子公司的判断标准、母公司股东的资格要件、被告范围的确立、前置程序的设置、滥用诉讼的防范以及诉讼费用的改革作出明确具体的规定。

关键词: 母子公司, 双重代表诉讼, 股东权利, 董事责任

Abstract: In the parent-subsidiary company, it is difficult for parent company’s shareholders to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests when the subsidiary company commits an illegal act and both the parent company and the subsidiary company are inactive in filing a lawsuit. Article 188 of The Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised Draft) (Second Draft) stipulates that the shareholders of the parent company in the wholly-owned relationship are allowed to pursue the liability for illegal acts of the directors, supervisors, senior managers, and etc. of the subsidiary company to realize damage relief. However, the provisions are too general and narrow. The Company Law also needs to make clear and specific provisions on the judgment standard of the parent company and the subsidiary company, the qualification of shareholders of the parent company, the scope of defendants, the setting of the pre-procedure, the prevention of litigation abuse and the reform of litigation costs in the dual representative litigation system.

Key words:  parent-subsidiary company, dual representative litigation, shareholders’ rights, directors’ liability

中图分类号: