北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 20-25.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

非涉外纠纷约定境外仲裁的条款效力问题探微

  

  1. 中国政法大学 国际法学院,北京100088
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-01 出版日期:2016-02-28
  • 基金资助:

    中国政法大学研究生创新基金项目(201414SSCX45)

Exploration on the Validity of Arbitration Agreement of Disputes without Foreign #br# Elements Submitted to Overseas Arbitration

  1. School of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2015-10-01 Online:2016-02-28

摘要:

国内企业约定境外仲裁的案件因最高人民法院的司法态度明晰化而受到关注,其所涉法律问题的核心指向此类仲裁条款的效力争议。现有的国际条约与国内立法没有正面的规定,而我国法院在典型案例中持否定立场,裁判依据却采用司法主权、公共政策等抽象概念,法律解释方法诡谲。对现行实践的反思,一方面须强调“涉外性”认定标准的适用;另一方面有必要对外商投资企业这一特定类型交易主体的争议解决进行反思。

关键词: 涉外性, 仲裁条款, 司法主权, 公共政策

Abstract:

In recent years, the cases of overseas arbitration submitted by some domestic enterprises have been concerned as The Supreme People’s Court has given an explicit judicial attitude, and the core legal issue involves how to evaluate the validity of the arbitration clause in the disputes Existing international treaties and domestic legislation do not provide the positive provisions while in a typical case in our country, the court holds negative position with the referee basis of abstract concepts such as judicial sovereignty and public policy Reflections on the current practice, on the one hand, the applicable standards of “foreign elements” should be emphasized; on the other hand, it is necessary to reflect on these issues involving foreign investment enterprises

Key words:  foreign elements, arbitration clause, judicial sovereignty, public policy

中图分类号: