北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 58-62.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

从欧盟“被遗忘权”看网络治理规则的选择

  

  1. 腾讯公司 腾讯研究院,北京100089
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-11 出版日期:2016-08-31

Choice of Internet Governance Rules from EU’s “Right to Be Forgotten”

  1. Tencent Research Institute, Tencent Inc, Beijing 100089, China
  • Received:2016-05-11 Online:2016-08-31

摘要:

 1995年以来,欧盟不断加强对个人数据的保护力度,被遗忘权由此成为欧盟个人数据保护立法上的一个重要概念,历经三个阶段,日趋受到合理限制。在国际上,各国在被遗忘权问题上,存在一般被遗忘权和特殊被遗忘权的立法分野,前者以欧盟最为典型,后者包括美国等国家。鉴于被遗忘权在实践层面并不能产生实质性效果,反倒给互联网产业创新发展带来负担,且既有规范体系已经足够为个人数据和隐私提供充分保护,因此我国未来在制定相关立法时,没必要引入甚至扩大被遗忘权,反而应当从数据最小化、通过设计保护隐私等层面做出努力,并且应当积极参与国际网络治理规则的制定。

关键词: 被遗忘权, 网络治理, 个人数据保护

Abstract:

Since 1995, EU legislators have been enhancing the protection of personal data, and right to be forgotten has become a major concept in EU’s personal data protection legislation, which is now subjected to reasonable restrictions after three stages In the international society, there are two different approaches to the right to be forgotten: the general approach and the special approach EU is the model of the former approach; and the latter approach includes US and other countries Considering that the right to be forgotten does not produce the prospective substancial effects, but incurs huge burdens to the development of Internet industry, and considering that the existing normative system has already provided sufficient protection to personal data and privacy, and therefore, it is unnecessary to import right to be forgotten or arbitrarily expands its scope To the contrary, the effective protection of personal data and privacy should avail of institutions such as data minimization and privacy by design Meanwhile, China should proactively participate in the formulation of international Internet governance rules

Key words:  right to be forgotten, Internet governance, protection of personal data

中图分类号: