北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 80-90.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2019.0100

• 社会治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

城乡协调发展视域下新型城镇化评价体系#br# 构建及实证研究

  

  1. 北京邮电大学 经济管理学院,北京100876
  • 出版日期:2019-06-30
  • 基金资助:
    北京市社会科学基金项目(16KDB014)

Construction of New-Type Urbanization Evaluation System #br# Based on Urban and Rural Coordinated Development

  1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • Online:2019-06-30

摘要: 结合新型城镇化发展新思路,提出从城乡平均发展水平及城乡差异情况两个维度出发,采用协调发展度模型进行综合评判的新型城镇化评价体系,并以《中国统计年鉴》作为主要数据来源,对全国31个省、自治区、直辖市2014—2017年的新型城镇化水平进行实证研究。结果表明:(1)新型城镇化发展水平不等同于经济发展水平,但同样存在“胡焕庸线之困”,并且面临着差距逐渐拉大的风险。(2)我国仍有近50%的地区平均发展水平与城乡差异情况之间存在不匹配现象。(3)各区域在新型城镇化发展中所存在问题既有相同之处也有不同之处,即各区域社会保障差异均较大,但短板各不相同(东部主要为社会服务水平,西部为经济发展水平,中部为基础设施水平,东部为生态环境)。最后,提出关于我国新型城镇化建设的两点建议。

关键词: 新型城镇化, 评价体系, Borda模糊法, 协调发展度模型

Abstract: Combined with the new idea of urbanization development and by adopting coordinated development degree to make comprehensive evaluation, the new-type urbanization evaluation system is put forward, which includes two dimensions, namely the average development and the differences of urban and rural areas An empirical study on the new-type urbanization level is done in 31 regions in 2014~2017, based on the data from China Statistical Yearbook The following conclusions can be obtained: 1The development level of new-type urbanization is not simply equal to the level of economic development, but there is also a dilemma of “Hu Huanyong Line” and the gap tends to be bigger; 2There is still a mismatch between the average development level and the differences between urban and rural areas in nearly 50% of China; 3The deficiencies of the development of new-type urbanization in each region are different Based on the conclusions, two suggestions are put forward on the construction of new-type urbanization

Key words: new-type urbanization, evaluation system, Borda model, coordinated development degree model

中图分类号: