小微企业合作网络特征对企业成长影响的实证研究

北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 74-80.

小微企业合作网络特征对企业成长影响的实证研究

北京邮电大学经济管理学院，北京100876

收稿日期:2016-07-31 出版日期:2016-12-31

Empirical Research on Effects of Micro and Small Enterprise Cooperative #br# Network Characters on Enterprises Growth

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,
Beijing 100876, China

Received:2016-07-31 Online:2016-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以小微企业为研究对象，收集了小微企业与其他主体之间建立合作关系所构建的网络数据。通过Pajek网络分析工具实现了

网络的可视化，直观呈现了小微企业合作网络。对合作网络节点主体中心性分析发现整体网络的集中程度较低，结构较为松散，同

时网络中存在6个子群，子群之间基本不存在合作关系，说明资源和信息流通并不顺畅，大部分小微企业对资源掌控能力较弱。细

化网络特征为：网络密度、关系强度、建立与维持关系的主动性、中心性和网络异质性五个指标，研究对企业成长的影响发现，网

络异质性对企业财务绩效没有显著影响，但是对创新能力具有促进作用，此外其余假设均得到支持。

关键词: 小微企业, 合作分析, 产业网络, 网络特征

Abstract:

Network data obtained through cooperative relationship between the micro and small enterprises and

other subjects is collected. Pajek helps to realize visualization of network, and present the cooperative network

of micro and small enterprises. The centrality analysis of network nodes indicates the whole network shows low

centrality and loose structure; meanwhile, 6 subgroups exist in cooperation network, but hardly have cooperative

relationship, which suggests resource and information flow is not smooth and most micro and small enterprises are

weak in source control. Divide network characters into 5 parts: density, strength of ties, relationship desire,

centrality and heterogeneity. Empirical research shows that heterogeneity has significantly positive influence on

creative performance but no influence on finance performance; other hypotheses are supported.

Key words: micro and small enterprise, cooperation analysis, industrial network, network character

中图分类号:

F279.24

李瑾颉，孙启明.

小微企业合作网络特征对企业成长影响的实证研究

[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2016, 18(6): 74-80.

LI Jin-jie, SUN Qi-ming. Empirical Research on Effects of Micro and Small Enterprise Cooperative #br# Network Characters on Enterprises Growth[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2016, 18(6): 74-80.

参考文献

［1］ De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C. Business training and female enterprise start-up, growth, and

dynamics: experimental evidence from Sri Lanka ［J］. Journal of Development Economics, 2014, 106: 199-210.
［2］ Khoja F. The triad: organizational cultural values, practices and strong social intra-firm networks ［J］.

Journal of Business Strategies, 2010, 27(2): 205.
［3］赵忠华. 创新型产业集群企业网络关系特征与创新绩效关系:知识流动视角的路径研究［J］. 哈尔滨商业大学学报（社会

科学版）, 2013(1): 77-86.
［4］ Zaheer A, Bell G G. Benefiting from network position:firm capabilities, structural holes, and

performance ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(9): 809-825.
［5］李浩, 胡海青. 网络关系强度与企业创新类型——基于不确定性环境下的实证分析［J］. 华东经济管理, 2014, 28

(4): 154-161.
［6］ Maurer I, Ebers M. Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from

biotechnology start-ups ［J］. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2006, 51(2): 262-292.
［7］ Bhagavatula S, Elfring T, Van Tilburg A, et al. How social and human capital influence opportunity

recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry ［J］. Journal of Business Venturing, 2010,

25(3): 245-260.
［8］ Batjargal B. The effects of network's structural holes: polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and

new venture growth in China and Russia ［J］. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2010, 4(2): 146-163.
［9］ Crook T R, Todd S Y, Combs J G, et al. Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship

between human capital and firm performance ［J］. Journal of applied psychology, 2011, 96(3): 443-456.

[1]	田发，谢凡. 小微企业税收优惠政策效应评估[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2018, 20(3): 69-75.
[2]	王明鹏，姚启昌，孙启明. 基于社会和人力资本的数字内容小微企业发展研究[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English letters), 2015, 17(5): 54-59.