北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (5): 31-34.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

论仲裁第三人的确定

  

  1. (北京邮电大学 人文学院,北京100876)
  • 出版日期:2011-10-30 发布日期:2023-03-27

Discussion on the Ascertaining of the Third Party in Arbitration

(School of Humanity, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing 100876,China)   

  • Online:2011-10-30 Published:2023-03-27

摘要:

由于我国法律对于仲裁第三人制度没有作规定,但仲裁第三人又是仲裁实践中经常遇到的困境,因此,有学者提出要在我国建立类似于诉讼第三人制度的仲裁第三人制度。笔者认为,建立仲裁第三人制度虽然有着理论上的合理性,但是不可否认,仲裁第三人制度也动摇了仲裁意思自治的基石;虽然应当建立仲裁第三人制度,但是应当严格限定仲裁第三人的范围,明确仲裁第三人应当具备的主体、实体性要件,严格仲裁第三人加入仲裁程序的条件,以期在仲裁意思自治与现实需要中求得平衡。

关键词: 仲裁第三人, 仲裁协议, 仲裁效率, 意思自治

Abstract:

Since no law has specified the third party in arbitration in our country, considering the dilemma that arbitration encountered, scholars have put forward a system of the third party in arbitration like the system of third party in the civil litigation The author thinks that although such a system has its theoretical rationality, it shakes will autonomy of arbitration The system should be built, but its range should be restricted and its major and substantive essentials should be clarified And only when all the parties in arbitration have reached agreement, could the system of the third party in arbitration be applied
Key words:third party in arbitration; arbitration agreement; arbitration efficiency;will autonomy 

中图分类号: