Knowledge Structure, Research Overview and Interdisciplinary Research Enlightenment of AI Ethics Abroad

doi:10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2020.0203

Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 74-86.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2020.0203

Previous Articles Next Articles

Knowledge Structure, Research Overview and Interdisciplinary Research Enlightenment of AI Ethics Abroad

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,
Beijing 100876, China

Received:2020-07-24 Online:2020-10-30 Published:2020-11-06
Supported by:

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the research status of AI ethics abroad, by using CiteSpace, the English literature on AI ethics in the core database of Web of Science is studied. First, the knowledge structure including knowledge base and research frontier is introduced with the analysis of co-citation network cluster. Second, the major disciplines for the study of AI ethics is summarized with the analysis of disciplinary co-occurrence. Then, the key words are integrated into information-model which provides a comprehensive overview on AI ethics from four aspects: information, technology, human and society. Finally, research topics in different aspects and different disciplines are discussed, so as to inspire interdisciplinary research and cooperation in relative fields.

Key words: , AI ethics, knowledge structure, research overview, information model, interdisciplinary

CLC Number:

B82-057
G353

WAN Yan, YANG Yue-zhao, LI Ming-hui. Knowledge Structure, Research Overview and Interdisciplinary Research Enlightenment of AI Ethics Abroad[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 74-86.

References ［65］

［1］	MUEHLHAUSER L, HELM L. The singularity and machine ethics［C］//EDEN A, MOOR J, SORAKER J, et al.Singularity Hypotheses. Berlin: Springer, 2012: 101-126.
［2］	ANDERSON M, ANDERSON S L, BERENZ V. A value-driven eldercare robot: virtual and physical instantiations of a case-supported principle-based behavior paradigm［J］.Proceedings of the IEEE, 2018, 107(3): 526- 540.
［3］	ALLEN C, SMIT I, WALLACH W. Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2005, 7(3): 149-155.
［4］	GUNKEL D. The machine question: critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics［M］. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2012: 2-15.
［5］	莫宏伟. 强人工智能与弱人工智能的伦理问题思考［J］.科学与社会, 2018, 8(1): 14-24.
［6］	VERUGGIO G. The birth of roboethics［DB/OL］. (2005-05-18)［2020-07-16］.http://www.roboethics.org/icra2005/veruggio.pdf.
［7］	ANDERSON M, ANDERSON S L, ARMEN C. Toward machine ethics: implementing two action-based ethical theories［R］. FS-05-06 1-7, Virginia: AAAI, 2005.
［8］	陈悦, 陈超美, 胡志刚, 等. 引文空间分析原理与应用［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 43-65.
［9］	SHARKEY A, SHARKEY N. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2012, 14(1): 27-40.
［10］	BOSTROM N. Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies［M］. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
［11］	BONNEFON J-F, SHARIFF A, RAHWAN I. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles［J］.Science, 2016, 352(6293): 1573-1576.
［12］	WALLACH W, ALLEN C. Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong［M］. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
［13］	ARKIN R. Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots［M］. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.
［14］	LIN P, ABNEY K, BEKEY G. Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics［M］. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012.
［15］	ANDERSON M, ANDERSON S. Machine ethics［M］. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
［16］	WYNSBERGHE A. Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design［J］.Science and Engineering Ethics, 2013, 19(2): 407-433.
［17］	O’NEIL C. Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy［M］. New York: Crown Publishers, 2016.
［18］	GOGOLL J, UHL M. Rage against the machine: automation in the moral domain［J］.Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2018, 74: 97-103.
［19］	BIGMAN Y, GRAY K. People are averse to machines making moral decisions［J］.Cognition, 2018, 181: 21-34.
［20］	SHANK D, DESANTI A. Attributions of morality and mind to artificial intelligence after real-world moral violations［J］.Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 86: 401-411.
［21］	AWAD E, DSOUZA S, KIM R, et al. The moral machine experiment［J］.Nature, 2018, 563(7729):59-64.
［22］	REDDEN J. Democratic governance in an age of datafication: lessons from mapping government discourses and practices［J］.Big Data & Society, 2018, 5(2): 1-13.
［23］	MARDA V. Artificial intelligence policy in India: a framework for engaging the limits of data-driven decision-making［DB/OL］. (2018-10-15) ［2020-07-16］.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0087.
［24］	RAHWAN I. Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2018, 20(1): 5-14.
［25］	WINFIELD A, JIROTKA M. Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems［DB/OL］. (2018-10-15) ［2020-07-16］.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0085.
［26］	WILLIAMS A, LIU Y, REGNER K, et al. Artificial intelligence, physiological genomics, and precision medicine［J］.Physiological Genomics, 2018, 50(4): 237-243.
［27］	PARK S, KIM Y-H, LEE J, et al. Ethical challenges regarding artificial intelligence in medicine from the perspective of scientific editing and peer review［J］.Science Editing, 2019, 6(2): 91-98.
［28］	PESAPANE F, VOLONTé C, CODARI M, et al. Artificial intelligence as a medical device in radiology: ethical and regulatory issues in Europe and the United States［J］.Insights into Imaging, 2018, 9(5): 745-753.
［29］	PECA A. Robot enhanced therapy for children with autism disorders: measuring ethical acceptability［J］.IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2016, 35(2): 54-66.
［30］	COECKELBERGH M, POP C, SIMUT R, et al. A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment［J］.Science and Engineering Ethics, 2016, 22(1): 47-65.
［31］	TONKENS R. Out of character: on the creation of virtuous machines［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2012, 14(2): 137-149.
［32］	COECKELBERGH M. Robot rights? towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2010, 12(3): 209-221.
［33］	JENKINS S, DRAPER H. Monitoring, and companionship: views on care robots from older people and their carers［J］.International Journal of Social Robotics, 2015, 7(5): 673-683.
［34］	IENCA M, WANGMO T, JOTTERAND F, et al. Ethical design of intelligent assistive technologies for dementia: a descriptive review［J］.Science and Engineering Ethics, 2018, 24(4): 1035-1055.
［35］	TORRESEN J. A review of future and ethical perspectives of robotics and AI［DB/OL］. (2018-01-15) ［2020-07-16］. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00075.
［36］	VANDERELST D, WINFIELD A. An architecture for ethical robots inspired by the simulation theory of cognition［J］.Cognitive Systems Research, 2018, 48: 56-66.
［37］	ZHANG P, BENJAMIN R. Understanding information related fields: a conceptual framework［J］.Journal of the American Society for Information Science Technology, 2007, 58(13): 1934-1947.
［38］	LI X, ZHANG T. An exploration on artificial intelligence application: from security, privacy and ethic perspective［C］//2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA). Chengdu：IEEE, 2017: 416-420.
［39］	CONTISSA G, DOCTER K, LAGIOIA F, et al. Claudette meets GDPR: automating the evaluation of privacy policies using artificial intelligence［DB/OL］. (2018-06-25) ［2020-07-16］.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3208596.
［40］	ARRIETA A, DíAZ-RODRíGUEZ N, SER J, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI):concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI［J］.Information Fusion, 2020, 58: 82-115.
［41］	SELBST A, BAROCAS S. The intuitive appeal of explainable machines［J］.Fordham Law Review, 2018, 87(3): 1085-1140.
［42］	SOTALA K, YAMPOLSKIY R. Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: a survey［DB/OL］. (2014-12-19) ［2020-07-16］.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-8949/90/1/018001/meta.
［43］	VEALE M, BINNS R, EDWARDS L. Algorithms that remember: model inversion attacks and data protection law［DB/OL］. (2018-10-15) ［2020-07-16］. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0083.
［44］	GOODMAN B, FLAXMAN S. European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a ″right to explanation″［J］.AI Magazine, 2016, 38(3): 50-57.
［45］	ULLMAN D, MALLE B. Measuring gains and losses in human-robot trust: evidence for differentiable components of trust［DB/OL］. (2019-03-25) ［2020-07-16］.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8673154.
［46］	KEMENADE M, HOORN J, KONIJN E. Do you care for robots that care? Exploring the opinions of vocational care students on the use of healthcare robots［J］.Robotics, 2019, 8(1): 1-22.
［47］	SOMMER K, NIELSEN M, DRAHEIM M, et al. Children’s perceptions of the moral worth of live agents, robots, and inanimate objects［DB/OL］. (2019-06-30) ［2020-07-16］.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.06.009.
［48］	KAHN P, ISHIGURO T, FREIER H, et al. ″Robovie, you′ll have to go into the closet now″: Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot［J］.Developmental Psychology, 2012, 48(2): 303-314.
［49］	DANAHER J. Robot betrayal: a guide to the ethics of robotic deception［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2020, 22: 117-128.
［50］	SCHEUTZ M, ARNOLD T. Are we ready for sex robots?［DB/OL］. (2016-03-07) ［2020-07-16］.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7451772.
［51］	GRAAF M. An ethical evaluation of human-robot relationships［J］.International Journal of Social Robotics, 2016, 8(4): 589-598.
［52］	JOHNSON D, VERDICCHIO M. Why robots should not be treated like animals［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2018, 20(4): 291-301.
［53］	CIECHANOWSKI L, PRZEGALINSKA A, MAGNUSKI M, et al. In the shades of the uncanny valley: an experimental study of human-chatbot interaction［J］.Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019, 92: 539-548.
［54］	ABUBSHAIT A, WIESE E. You look human, but act like a machine: agent appearance and behavior modulate different aspects of human-robot interaction［DB/OL］. (2017-08-23) ［2020-07-16］.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01393.
［55］	GRAAF M. An ethical evaluation of human-robot relationships［J］.International Journal of Social Robotics, 2016, 8(4): 589-598.
［56］	COECKELBERGH M. Why care about robots? empathy, moral standing, and the language of suffering［J］.Kairos Journal of Philosophy & Science, 2018, 20(1): 141-158.
［57］	MALLE B F. Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2016, 18(4): 243-256.
［58］	DECKER M, DILLMANN R, DREIER T, et al. Service robotics: do you know your new companion? Framing an interdisciplinary technology assessment［J］.Poiesis and Praxis, 2011, 8(1): 25-44.
［59］	SAUD S. Ethical issues and related considerations involved with artificial intelligence andautonomous systems［J］.International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2018, 9(4): 35-40.
［60］	赫拉利. 未来简史［M］. 北京: 中信出版社, 2017: 313-319.
［61］	PEREIRA L, SAPTAWIJAYA A. Modelling morality with prospective logic［J］.International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems, 2009, 1(3-4): 209-221.
［62］	UMBRELLO S. The moral psychology of value sensitive design: the methodological issues of moral intuitions for responsible innovation［J］.Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2018, 5(2): 186-200.
［63］	SULLINS J. RoboWarfare: can robots be more ethical than humans on the battlefield?［J］.Ethics and Information Technology, 2010, 12(3): 263-275.
［64］	KATYAL S. Private accountability in the age of artificial intelligence［DB/OL］. (2019-01-15) ［2020-07-16］. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3309397.
［65］	BURTON E, GOLDSMITH J. Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence courses［J］.AI Magazine, 2017, 38(2): 22-34.

[1]	HUANG Miao. Media Affordance of E-retailing Short Video: Text Mining and Comparative Study #br# of Beauty Anchor in Kwai [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 1-9.
[2]	LIANG Shuang. Media-technology Interaction and Communication-rules Reconstruction Based on “User-centered” Pattern under Background of “context +” era [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 10-16.
[3]	FU Kui, YIN Xiao-yan, WANG Qian . Stock Trend Prediction of Multi-feature Based on LSTM#br# [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 17-27.
[4]	CHENG Xi . Review of Research on Product Service System and Service Design [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 61-73.
[5]	JI Yang, LI Si-qi, ZHANG Mo-yu. Feasibility of Development Prediction of Metacognitive Evaluation Ability [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(5): 117-124.
[6]	DING Guo-min, LIAN Hao-qiong. Causes and Countermeasures of Robo-Advisor Regulatory Dilemma#br# [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(4): 9-16.
[7]	TIAN Zu-hai, WU Ya-jing. Impact of Free Trade Agreement on Chinese Manufacturing Exports: Based on Data about Countries of the Belt and Road Initiatives#br# [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(4): 17-26.
[8]	QI Jia-yin, HU Shuai-bo, ZHANG Ya. Application of Artificial Intelligence Chatterbot in Digital Marketing-Literature Review [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(4): 59-70.
[9]	DU Hui-ying, GENG Zhi-min . Unmanned Hotel Consumers’ Use Intention Based on Social Cognitive Theory#br# [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(4): 80-89.
[10]	ZHAO Xin-yan, LAI Mei-zhan. Impact of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education on University Students’ Innovative and Entrepreneurial Competencies and Intentions [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(4): 90-102.
[11]	JIN Juan, DU Yu-di. Influencing Mechanism of University Students’ Entrepreneurial Psychological Capital — From the Perspective of Positive Psychology [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 22(4): 112-122.
[12]	YUAN Chun-Hui, MA Yue. Impact of E-commerce Poverty Alleviation on Economic #br# Development in Chinas Underdeveloped Regions#br# —Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of 31 Provinces in China from 2012 to 2018 [J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2020, 22(3): 39-47.
[13]	PAN Lin-qing. Boundary Basis and Legislative Expression of Personal Sensitive Information: Concurrent Comment on Article 1034 of the Civil Code（Draft） [J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2020, 22(2): 30-39.
[14]	HUANG Kai, WANG Jian. Domestic Regional Logistics Research Status and Hot Spot Visualization Analysis based on Bibliometrics [J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2020, 22(2): 86-95.
[15]	DU Zhen-hua, ZHOU Shu. Dynamic Adjustment Mechanism for Spectrum Resource Allocation in China [J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2020, 22(1): 14-19.

Knowledge Structure, Research Overview and Interdisciplinary Research Enlightenment of AI Ethics Abroad

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References ［65］

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments