[1] 克劳斯·施瓦布,尼古拉斯·戴维斯.第四次工业革命:行动路线图-打造创新型社会[M].世界经济论坛北京代表处,译.北京:中信出版社,2018:81-82.
[2] 韩家炜.数据挖掘:概念与技术[M].范明等,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2012:1-2.
[3] DREYFUSS R C. Expressive genericity: trademarks as language in the pepsi generation[J]. Notre Dame Law. Review, 1989, 65(3): 397-424.
[4] Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition. Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition on the Proposed Modernisation of European Copyright Rules PART B Exceptions and Limitations Chapter 1 Text and Data Mining[DB/OL].(2017-9-28)[2020-11-6]. https://www.ip.mpg.de/en/projects/details/modernisation-of-european-copyright-rules.html.
[5] SAMUELSON P. The EU’s controversial digital single market directive[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2018, 61(11): 20-23.
[6] IVIR. The Next Rembrandt[DB/OL].(2019-7-24)[2020-11-6]. https://www.nextrembrandt.com/.
[7] 宗成庆,夏睿,张家俊.文本数据挖掘[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2019:1.
[8] 吴汉东.人工智能生成作品的著作权法之问[J].中外法学,2020,32(3):653-673.
[9] 王迁.著作权法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015:421.
[10] 刘友华,魏远山.机器学习的著作权侵权问题及其解决[J].华东政法大学学报,2019,22(2):68-79.
[11] SAG M. Copyright and copy-reliant technology[J]. Northwestern University Law Review, 2009, 103(4): 1607-1682.
[12] LEVAL P N. Toward a fair use standard[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1990, 103(5): 1105-1136.
[13] CARROLL M W. Copyright and the progress of science: why text and data mining is lawful[J]. UC Davis Law Review, 2019, 53(2): 893-964.
[14] GRIMMELMANN J. Copyright for literate robots[J]. Iowa Law Revriew, 2015, 101(2): 657-682.
[15] SAG M. The new legal landscape for text mining and machine learning[J]. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 2019, 66(2): 291-367.
[16] SOBEL B L W. Artificial intelligence’s fair use crisis[J]. Columbia Journal Law & the Arts, 2017, 41(1): 45-98.
[17] 李安.机器学习作品的著作权法分析-非作品性使用、合理使用与侵权使用[J].电子知识产权,2020(6):60-70.
[18] SONY CSL. Sony CSL Paris has released deepbach[DB/OL].(2016-12-21)[2020-11-6]. https://www.sonycsl.co.jp/news/3882/.
[19] MERGES R P. The end of friction-property rights and contract in the newton world of on-line commerce[J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 1997, 12(1): 115-136.
[20] Office Journal of the European Union. Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC[DB/OL].(2019-5-17)[2020-11-6]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L0790&from=EN.
[21] Commission of the European Communities. A single market for 21st century Europe. Brussels[DB/OL]. (2007-11-20)[2020-11-6].https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0724:FIN:EN:PDF.
[22] LAZER D, PENTLAND A, ADAMIC L, et al. Social science. Computational social science[J]. Science, 2009, 323(5915): 721-723.
[23] HIMMELSTEIN D S,ROMERO A R,LEVERNIER J G,et al. Research: sci-hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature, elife sci[DB/OL].(2018-2-9)[2020-11-6]. https://elifesciences.org/articles/32822.
[24] ELSEVIER. Text and Data Mining[DB/OL].(2015-4-9)[2020-11-6]. https://www.elsevier.com/open-science/research-data/text-and-data-mining.
[25] SPRINGER NATURE. Text and Data Mining at Springer Nature[DB/OL].(2016-5-8)[2020-11-6]. https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining.
[26] GOOGLE WORKSPACE. Google Workspace M Gmail[DB/OL].(2015-9-8)[2020-11-6].https://workspace.google.com/products/gmail/.
[27] NIMMER D. Nimmer on copyright[M]. New York:LexisNexis, 2013:1303.
[28] SAMUELSON P. A fresh look at tests for nonliteral copyright infringement[J]. Northwestern University Law Review, 2012, 107(4): 1821-1850.
[29] 许波.著作权保护范围的确定及实质性相似的判断-以历史剧本类文字作品为视角[J].知识产权,2012(2):28-34.
[30] 王春燕. 作品中的表达与作品之间的实质相似:以两组美国著作权判例为线索[J]. 中外法学, 2000 (5): 630-640.
[31] 梁志文. 版权法上实质性相似的判断[J]. 法学家, 2015, 4(6): 37-50.
[32] NARD C A. Legal forms and the common law of patents[J]. Boston University Law Review, 2010, 90(1): 51-108.
|