北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 62-77.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2023.0122

• 社会治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会捐赠的家庭参与:“U”形收入关系与第三次分配

肖凯元(1999—),男,山东菏泽人,博士研究生   

  1. 北京大学 马克思主义学院,北京100871
  • 出版日期:2024-04-30 发布日期:2024-05-10
  • 作者简介:肖凯元(1999—),男,山东菏泽人,博士研究生
  • 基金资助:
    国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目(20AZD012)

Households’ Participation in Social Donations:“U”-shaped Income Relationship and Tertiary Distribution

  1. School of Marxism, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Online:2024-04-30 Published:2024-05-10

摘要:  重新考察中国家庭社会捐赠行为的收入效应,使用2014年、2016年和2018年的中国家庭追踪调查数据,采用断尾回归和Heckman两阶段模型检验并解决OLS回归中可能存在的断尾问题和样本选择偏误问题。研究发现,我国参与社会捐赠的家庭比例为19.1%,参与捐款的家庭年均捐款为449.61元。社会捐赠的收入弹性为0.29,与基准回归的结果(0.21)的差异主要是由左侧断尾问题引起。由于中等收入家庭较低的参与率,社会捐赠具有明显的“U”形收入关系。进一步比较家庭参与第三次分配三种方式,即礼金、经济支持和社会捐赠,并分析三种方式收入效应差异产生的来源。基于以上讨论,提出应当进一步拓宽家庭第三次分配参与渠道。

关键词:  , 第三次分配;社会捐赠;收入效应;共同富裕;断尾回归

Abstract:  The income effect of Chinese households’ social donation behavior is re-examined. Using data from Chinese Family Panel Studies in 2014, 2016 and 2018, truncated regression and Heckman two-stage model are employed to test and solve possible truncation and sample selection bias problems in OLS (ordinary least square) regression. It is found that the proportion of households’ participation in social donations in China is 19.1%, and the average annual donation in these households is 449.61 yuan. The income elasticity of social donations is 0.29, and the difference from the result of the OLS (0.21) is mainly caused by left truncation. Due to the lower participation rate of middle-income households, social donations show a clear “U”-shaped income relationship. The three modes of households’ participation in tertiary distribution, i.e., gifts, financial support and social donations are compared and the reasons for the differences in the income effects of the three modes are analyzed. Based on the above discussion, it is proposed that channels for households’ participation in tertiary distribution should be further broadened.

Key words: tertiary distribution, social donation, income effect, common prosperity, truncated regression 

中图分类号: