北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 11-16.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

比较分析:我国隐私权刑法保护的进路

  

  1. 山东大学 法学院,山东 威海264209
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-09 出版日期:2017-12-30

Access to Criminal Protection of Privacy in China: Comparative Analysis

  1. School of Law, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
  • Received:2017-09-09 Online:2017-12-30

摘要: 新社会视野下侵犯隐私权的行为大量出现,我国自1997年刑法典到《刑法修正案(九)》的颁布,都以不断修正、不断突出、不断明确的方式对隐私权进行保护。而我国隐私权刑法保护仍存在体系结构尚未搭建、核心法益尚未完整保护、起诉方式和刑罚内容单一等不足之处。国际社会对于隐私权刑法保护作出了有效应答,借由德国刑法及我国台湾地区“刑法”的比较分析,以示我国刑法在隐私权保护方面的可采点及补足点。

关键词:  , 隐私权, 刑法保护, 刑事立法

Abstract: In the new era, the phenomena of privacy infringement have become prevalent in the society, while the criminal protection of privacy in China is still in an inferior position in many aspects For instance, its system construction still has room for improvement, the core legal interests have not been effectively protected yet and the contents of proceeding and penalty are inflexible Meanwhile, effective response has been given to such protection of privacy in the international community Through a comparative analysis of the criminal law of German, Taiwan Province, Mainland China, some approaches and suggestions are investigated for the criminal protection of privacy in China

Key words: right of privacy, criminal protection, criminal legislation

中图分类号: