北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 33-38.

• 互联网治理与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

论涉众型网络犯罪中电子证据的审查与认定

  

  1. 武汉大学 法学院,湖北 武汉430072
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-07 出版日期:2015-12-30 发布日期:2023-03-27

Examination and Authentication of Electronic Evidence in Public-related Cybercrime

  1. School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2015-09-07 Online:2015-12-30 Published:2023-03-27

摘要:

《关于办理网络犯罪案件适用刑事诉讼程序若干问题的意见》第一次对涉众型网络犯罪做出了官方定义,将其列为网络犯罪的四大类别之一。该类案件因波及的被害人众多且位置分散,而产生了证据审查与认定中的新困难。建议在形式审查中,将被告审核证据的时间提到庭审之前,依托侦查机关或检察机关的硬件设施,以庭前会议的方式,来保障辩方充分行使质证权;在内容验真时,建议区分静态存储和动态演示两类电子证据来审查。而司法解释中对于证据难以逐一查实的情况之规定,放宽了认定犯罪事实的尺度,但因有“排除合理怀疑”证明标准相冲突之嫌,故在实践中应从严适用为宜。

关键词:  , 网络犯罪;电子证据;证据法则;真实性审查

Abstract:

The public-related cybercrime is first defined officially in The Act Concerning Several Issues of Criminal Procedure in Cybercrime(2014), and it is classified as one of the four kinds of cybercrimes New difficulties on the authentication of electronic evidence are created because this crime involves many victims who are in different places The technological facilities in investigating institution or procuratorate can be used to ensure the defendant have enough time to examine the electronic evidence in pre-court session It is suggested that static storage and dynamic demonstration should be examined separately in content verification The Act provides a flexible measure But the “beyond reasonable doubt” proof standard should be obeyed; the court should apply this provision strictly

Key words: public-related cybercrime, electronic evidence, best evidence principle, authentication

中图分类号: