中国情境下双元领导与员工主动变革行为的影响机制研究

doi:10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2022.0072

北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 80-91.doi: 10.19722/j.cnki.1008-7729.2022.0072

中国情境下双元领导与员工主动变革行为的影响机制研究

张志明(1971—)，男，安徽合肥人，博士，副教授

安徽大学商学院

出版日期:2022-10-30 发布日期:2022-11-16
作者简介:张志明(1971—)，男，安徽合肥人，博士，副教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目 (71872001)；安徽大学文科创新团队建设(S030314002/014)

Influence Mechanism of Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees’ Active Change Behavior in Chinese Context

School of Business, Anhui University

Online:2022-10-30 Published:2022-11-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过探讨中国情境下双元领导与员工主动变革行为的影响机制与理论边界，创新性引入并检验了中国儒家文化中典型且理想的人格特质——君子人格的调节作用，以及矛盾思维的中介作用。采用Bootstrap法和层次回归法对421份员工问卷数据进行统计分析，研究结论表明：双元领导正向促进员工主动变革行为，矛盾思维在其中起部分中介作用；员工君子人格显著正向调节双元领导与矛盾思维的关系以及上述中介效应，表现为这一间接效应对于高君子人格的员工而言显著较强。因此在中国情境下，为促进员工主动变革行为，领导者应积极展现双元行为，激发员工的矛盾思维能力，并注重甄别和培育员工的君子人格。

关键词: , 双元领导；主动变革行为；矛盾思维；君子人格

Abstract: The moderating role of the virtuous personality, a typical and ideal personality trait in Chinese Confucian culture, and the mediating role of paradoxical thinking were introduced and verified by discussing the influence mechanism and theoretical boundary of ambidextrous leadership and employees’ active change behavior in Chinese context. Bootstrap method and hierarchical regression analysis were used to analyze the data of 421 employees’ questionnaires. The results showed that ambidextrous leadership positively promoted employees’ active change behavior, and paradoxical thinking played a partially mediating role. The relationship between ambidextrous leadership and paradoxical thinking, and the above mediating effect were positively moderated by employees’ virtuous personality, which meant this indirect effect was significantly stronger for the employees with the high virtuous personality. Therefore, in the Chinese context, in order to promote employees’ active behavior change, leaders should actively display ambidextrous behavior to stimulate employees’ ability of paradoxical thinking, and pay attention to identifying and cultivating employees’ virtuous personality.

Key words: ambidextrous leadership, active change behavior, paradoxical thinking, the virtuous personality

中图分类号:

F272.92

张志明, 杨南奎. 中国情境下双元领导与员工主动变革行为的影响机制研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 80-91.

ZHANG Zhiming, YANG Nankui. Influence Mechanism of Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees’ Active Change Behavior in Chinese Context[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 24(5): 80-91.

参考文献

［1］ ZHANG Y, WALDMAN D A, HAN Y L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people, management: Antecedents and consequences ［J］.Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58( 2):538-566．
［2］罗瑾琏,赵莉,韩杨,等.双元领导研究进展述评［J］.管理学报,2016, 13(12):1882-1889.
［3］ ZACHER H, ROSING K. Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation ［J］. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2015, 36 (1):54-68.
［4］ PARKER S K, WILLIAMS H M, TURNER N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work ［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(3):636-652.
［5］ KIM T Y, LIU Z. Taking charge and employee outcomes: The moderating effect of emotional competence ［J］. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2015, 28(5):775-793.
［6］ MORRISON E W, PHELPS C C. Taking charge at work: Extra role efforts to initiate workplace change ［J］. Academy of Management Journal,1999, 42(4):403-419.
［7］ SMITH W K, TUSHMAN M L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams ［J］. Organization Science,2005, 16(5):522-536.
［8］ KELLER T, WEIBLER J. What it takes and costs to be an ambidextrous manager: Linking leadership and cognitive strain to balancing exploration and exploitation ［J］.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,20 14, 22(1):54-71.
［9］ GIOIA D A, MANZ C C. Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning ［J］.The Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(3):527.
［10］ MIRON-SPEKTOR E, GINO F, ARGOTE L. Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration ［J］.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,2011,116(2):229-240.
［11］胡文安,罗瑾琏,钟竞.双元创新搜索视角下组织创新绩效的提升路径研究:领导行为的触发作用［J］.科学学与科学技术管理,2017, 38(4):60-72.
［12］罗瑾琏,胡文安,钟竞.双元领导对团队创新的影响机制研究：基于互动认知的视角［J］.华东经济管理,2016, 30(7):35-44.
［13］牛莉霞,刘勇.双元领导的双刃剑效应:矛盾体验与中庸思维的作用［J］.中国人力资源开发,2021, 38(03):63-73.
［14］ TAYLOR S G, BEDEIAN A G, KLUEMPER D H. Linking workplace incivility to citizenship performance: The combined effects of affective commitment and conscientiousness ［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2012, 33(7): 878-893.
［15］葛枭语,侯玉波.君子不忧不惧:君子人格与心理健康：自我控制与真实性的链式中介［J］.心理学报,2021, 53(4):374-386.
［16］ OLUWAFEMI T B, MITCHELMORE S, NIKOLOPOULOS K. Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs ［J］.Journal of Business Research, 2020, 119(3):195-208.
［17］ GEBERT D, BOERNER S, KEAMEY. Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? ［J］.Organization Science, 2010, 21(3):593-608.
［18］ ROSING K, FRESE M, BAUSCH A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership ［J］.Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(5):956-974.
［19］ SCHREUDERS J, LEGESSE A. Organizational ambidexterity: How small technology firms balance innovati- on and support ［J］.Technology Innovation Management Review, 2012, 2(2):17-21.
［20］ SAGIE A, ZAIDMAN N, AMICHAI H Y, et al. An empirical assessment of the loose-tight leadership model: Quantitative and qualitative analyses ［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2002,23(3):302-320.
［21］郭秋云,李南,彭灿.双元领导对战略变革的影响研究：基于组织文化导向视角［J］.研究与发展管理,2019, 31(01):142-152.
［22］ LUO B, ZHENG S, JI H, et al. Ambidextrous leadership and TMT-member ambidextrous behavior: The role of TMT behavioral integration and TMT risk propensity ［J］. International Journal of Human Resource Managem- ent, 2016, 29(2):1-22.
［23］侯楠,彭坚.恩威并施、积极执行与工作绩效：探索中国情境下双元领导的有效性［J］.心理学报, 2019, 51(1):117-127.
［24］张征,李锦.员工主动变革行为:前因与后果［J］.中国人力资源开发, 2019, 36(5):60-75.
［25］ FULLERJR J B, MARLER L E, HESTER K. Bridge building within the province of proactivity ［J］. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(8)：1053-1070.
［26］ MOON H, KAMDAR D, MAYER D M, et al. Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008,93(1):84-94.
［27］ YAO X, YANG Q, DONG N N, et al. Moderating effect of zhongyong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behavior ［J］.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 13(1):53-57.
［28］ WU C H, DENG H, LI Y. Enhancing a sense of competence at work by engaging in proactive behavior: the role of proactive personality ［J］. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016, 19(3):1-16.
［29］ KIM T Y, LIU Z, DIEFENDORFF J M. Leader-member exchange and job performance: The effects of taking charge and organizational tenure ［J］. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36(2):216-231.
［30］ XU Q, ZHAO Y X, XI M,et al. Impact of benevolent leadership on follower taking charge: roles of work engagement and role-breadth self-efficacy ［J］. Chinese Management Studies, 2018, 12(4):741-755.
［31］王圣慧,易明,罗瑾琏.双元领导对建言行为的影响:内部动机与外部动机的作用［J］.科学学与科学技术管理,2019, 40(7):136-150.
［32］胡文安,罗瑾琏.双元领导如何激发新员工创新行为？一项中国情境下基于认知:情感复合视角的模型构建［J］.科学学与科学技术管理,2020, 41(1):99-113.
［33］罗瑾琏,胡文安,钟竞.悖论式领导,团队活力对团队创新的影响机制研究［J］.管理评论,2017, 29(7):122-134
［34］ ARNOLD J A, ARAD S, RHOADES J A, et al. The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors ［J］. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2000, 21(3): 249-269.
［35］ LEE A, WILLIS S, TIAN A W. Empowering leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation ［J］. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2018, 39(3):306-325.
［36］ KIM D, MOON C W, SHIN J. Linkages between empowering leadership and subjective well-being and work performance via perceived organizational and co-worker support ［J］.Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2018, 39(7):844-858.
［37］ SOMECH A. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams ［J］. Journal of Management, 2006, 32(1):132-157.
［38］ MARTIN S L, LIAO H, CAMPBELL E M. Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity ［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 2012,56(5):1372-1395.
［39］ MIRON-SPEKTOR E, INGRAM A, KELLER J, et al. Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem ［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(1):26-45.
［40］ LEWIS M W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide ［J］. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(4):760-776.
［41］ SMITH W K, LEWIS M W. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing ［J］. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(2):381-403.
［42］ DREU C D, NIJSTAD B A. Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus ［J］.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2008, 95(3):648.
［43］张柏楠,徐世勇,王继新.矛盾思维对创新绩效的影响:员工跨界行为与关系冲突的作用［J］.科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(1):83-91.
［44］赵红丹,郭利敏,罗瑾琏.双元领导的双刃剑效应:基于认知紧张与工作活力双路径［J］.管理评论, 2021, 33(8):211-223.
［45］葛枭语,李小明,侯玉波.孔子思想中的君子人格:心理学测量的探索［J］.心理学报, 2021, 53(12):1321-1334.
［46］ AHEARNE M, MATHIEU J, RAPP A. To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance ［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(5):945-55.
［47］ PEARCE C, SIMS H P. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors ［J］. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2002, 6(2):172-197.
［48］ GE X Y. Oriental wisdom for interpersonal life: Confucian ideal personality traits (Junzi personality) predict positive interpersonal relationships ［J］. Journal of Research in Personality, 2020, 89:Article 104034.
［49］ PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, LEE J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies ［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
［50］ AIKEN L S, WEST S G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions［M］. Newbury Park: Sage,1991:28-47.
［51］赵红丹,郭利敏.双元领导与员工前瞻行为:认同与中庸的作用［J］.企业经济, 2018, 37(6):84-90.

[1]	赵保国, 崔书嘉. 绿色金融、金融科技与经济高质量发展[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(1): 12-24.
[2]	潘修平, 于晓琪. 通谋虚伪规则在金融领域的适用——以（2020）京民终36号判决为例[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(1): 61-66.
[3]	丁伟, 倪诗颖. 数字贸易视野下我国跨境数据监管的发展困境及合作治理[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(1): 67-76.
[4]	唐士亚, 张巍瑜. 金融科技伦理规制的基本法理与制度化构造[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(6): 21-27.
[5]	谢永江, 杨永兴. 人工智能时代下的算法歧视及其治理研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 18-25.
[6]	叶晓丹, 朱倩青. 盲盒销售的法律规制困境与出路探寻[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 26-31.
[7]	张爱华, 于涵, 陈超雨. 基于文本分析的运营商潜在升级投诉客户挖掘[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 32-38.
[8]	彭若弘, 李怡斐. 政策性负担与国有企业创新绩效 ——高管激励的调节效应[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 58-68.
[9]	赵宏中, 郭小莹. 高铁发展、人力资本与区域经济差距[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 69-79.
[10]	张静, 尼玛拉姆, 王欢. 抗疫元素融入高校思想政治理论课教学的三重逻辑[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 110-116.
[11]	高锦萍, 吴美娟. 公司年报信用信息披露质量对股权资本成本的影响[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(4): 39-50.
[12]	周晔, 王莉珍. 论列宁对伯恩施坦“和平长入社会主义”的认识与批判[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3): 1-4.
[13]	李钢, 徐佳音. 新时代党的政治建设的基本经验探析——学习贯彻党的十九届六中全会精神[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3): 5-12.
[14]	袁康, 鄢浩宇. 包容审慎视角下数据竞争法律制度的理念调适与范式革新[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3): 34-44.
[15]	兰朵. 新时代中国电影海外网络传播创新路径探寻[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3): 45-53.

中国情境下双元领导与员工主动变革行为的影响机制研究

Influence Mechanism of Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees’ Active Change Behavior in Chinese Context

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价