领导方式与抑制性进言的关系：以改善绩效为目标的情境

北京邮电大学学报(社科版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 87-94.

领导方式与抑制性进言的关系：以改善绩效为目标的情境

中央财经大学商学院，北京100081

收稿日期:2015-12-02 出版日期:2016-02-28

Relationship Between Leadership Style and Prohibitive Voice: #br# Under Contexts of Performance Improving

Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2015-12-02 Online:2016-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

抑制性进言是下级向上级提出的不同意见，影响进言意愿的前因变量很多。基于领导理论，通过实证方法考察了三种领导方式对抑制性进言意愿的影响效应。首先发现抑制性进言意愿确实对企业绩效有正向影响，更多反面或修正意见可提高前期决策的科学性。还发现交易型和变革型领导方式均有利于鼓励下属提出抑制性进言，且前者的鼓励作用更大；而倡导威权领导的家长式领导方式则不利于员工提出抑制性进言。结论说明，抑制性进言的缺失将产生虚假繁荣，最终企业绩效的下降将波及个人利益。因此，理性的领导者应放弃“注重形式、表面和谐”的领导逻辑，转而构建“以管理制度为主，以人际关系为辅”的领导模式。理性下属也应在形式尊重的前提下，持续性地提出进言，最终绩效改善的铁证将正反馈式地促进交易型或变革型领导方式的塑造。

关键词: , 领导方式, 抑制性进言, 企业绩效

Abstract:

Prohibitive voice is the different view proposed from subordinates to superiors There are many antecedent variables to influence prohibitive voice Based on leadership theory, the influence of three leadership styles on the willingness of prohibitive voice is empirically examined Firstly, prohibitive voice will indeed have a positive impact on business performance More negative or modified opinions can improve the prescientific decisionmaking It is also found that transactional and transformational leadership styles are conducive to encouraging subordinates to make prohibitive voice, and the effect of the former is larger However, the paternalistic leadership style is not conducive to encouraging subordinates to make prohibitive voice Conclusion shows that the lack of prohibitive voice will bring a fake prosperity, and the decline in business performance will ultimately affect individual’s interests Therefore, rational leaders should abandon the leadership logic of “focus on formality, surface harmony”, and should construct the leadership model of “management system comes first, supplemented by interpersonal relationship” Rational subordinates should also respect the superiors, and continue to make the prohibitive voice In this way, performance improvement will be the positive feedback to promote transactional and transformational leadership styles

Key words: leadership style, prohibitive voice, corporate performance

中图分类号:

G933
F272

郭骁. 领导方式与抑制性进言的关系：以改善绩效为目标的情境[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2016, 18(1): 87-94.

GUO Xiao. Relationship Between Leadership Style and Prohibitive Voice: #br# Under Contexts of Performance Improving[J]. JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOM, 2016, 18(1): 87-94.

参考文献

［1］ Detert J R, Burris E R. Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open?［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50（4）: 869884.
［2］ Nemeth C J. Managing innovation: when Less is more［J］. California Management Review, 1997, 40（1）: 5974.
［3］ Schwartz J, Wald M L. The Nation: NASA’s curse?: groupthink is 30 years old and still going strong［N］. New York Times, 20030309（5）.
［4］魏昕, 张志学. 组织中为什么缺乏抑制性进言?［J］. 管理世界, 2010（10）: 99109.
［5］ Van Dyne L, LePine J A. Helping and voice extrarole behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(1): 108119.
［6］ Liang J, Farh J L. Promotive and prohibitive voice behavior in organizations: a twowave longitudinal examination［C］//Biannual Meeting of International Association for Chinese Management Research(IACMR). Guangzhou: ［s.n.］， 2008.
［7］ LePine J A, Van DyneL. Voice and cooperative behavior as constricting forms of contextual performance: evidence of different relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86（2）: 326336.
［8］ Chen Zhenxiong, Francesco A M. The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China［J］. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2003, 62(3): 490510.
［9］ Morrison E W, Milliken F J. Speaking up, remaining silent: the dynamics of voice and silence in organizations［J］. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(6): 13631368.
［10］ Floyd S W, Wooldridge B. Dinosaurs or dynamics? recognizing middle management’s strategic role［J］. Academy of Management Executive, 1994, 8（4）: 4757.
［11］吴敏, 黄旭, 徐玖平, 等. 交易型领导、变革型领导与家长式领导行为的比较研究［J］. 科研管理, 2007, 28(3): 168176.
［12］李超平, 孟慧, 时勘. 变革型领导、家长式领导、PM理论与领导有效性关系的比较研究［J］. 心理科学, 2007, 30(6): 14771481.
［13］ Bass B M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations ［M］. New York: Free Press, 1985.
［14］ Bass B M. Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership［J］. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1999, 8(1): 932.
［15］ Bass B M, Avolio B J. The impliactions of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development［C］// Woodman R W, Pasmore W A. Research in Organizational Change and Development. Greenwich, CT: JAL Press, 1990: 231272.
［16］陈永霞, 贾良定, 李超平, 等. 变革型领导、心理授权与员工的组织承诺: 中国情景下的实证研究［J］. 管理世界, 2006(1): 101110.
［17］ Bass B M, Avolio B J. MLQ, multifactor leadership questionnaire: leader form, rater form, and scoring key for MLQ form 5xshort［M］. 2nd ed. Redwood City, Calif: Mind Garden, 2000.
［18］ Hsu F L K. Amrican and Chinese: passage to differences［M］. 3rd ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1981.
［19］ Redding S G. The spirit of Chinese capitalism［M］. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1990.
［20］ Farh J L, Cheng B S. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in chinese organization［J］. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2000, 7（13）: 127180.
［21］ Cheng B S, Chou L F, Farh L J. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: constructs and measurement［J］. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2000, 14（8）: 364.
［22］李子奈, 齐良书. 关于计量经济学模型方法的思考［J］. 中国社会科学, 2010（2）: 6971.
［23］李超平, 时勘. 变革型领导的结构与测量［J］. 心理学报, 2005, 37(6): 803811.
［24］ Covin J, Slevin D, Schultz R. Implementing strategic missions: effective strategic, structural and tactical choices［J］. Journal of Management Studies, 1994（31）: 481505.

[1]	田祖海, 吴雅静. 自由贸易协定对中国制造业出口的影响研究：基于“一带一路”沿线国家数[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 17-26.
[2]	刘树林, 张晟嘉. 营商环境评价体系的构建与研究——基于熵权TOPSIS法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 27-36.
[3]	齐佳音, 胡帅波, 张亚, . 人工智能聊天机器人在数字营销中的应用：文献综述[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 59-70.
[4]	胡桃, 郑君臣. 高校电子商务专业核心课程教学评价体系探究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(4): 103-111.
[5]	黄逸珺，靳晓晶，李琳. 欠发达地区义务教育应用MOOC的学习意愿影响因素研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2020, 22(1): 87-97.
[6]	熊莺,徐静,李颖臻. null[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(6): 1-10.
[7]	魏龙，杨晖. 服务外包对中国制造业出口复杂度影响的研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(6): 46-57.
[8]	彭若弘，苏玉苗. 创新补贴、税收优惠与高新技术产业研发产出[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(6): 77-89.
[9]	张爱华，陈超雨. 基于文本分析的中国5G产业发展研究——市场主体视角[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(6): 90-102.
[10]	徐俊杰，吴敏. 快递自取点服务质量量表的开发与验证[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(6): 103-111.
[11]	陈慧1，杨翠莹1，张涵2. 情绪视角下员工越轨创新行为研究：越轨钦佩的调节作用[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(5): 75-84.
[12]	傅魁，覃桂双. 基于Nutch的多源社交媒体情报采集系统[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(5): 85-92.
[13]	石川，马铭君，胡琳梅. 基于用户心理的网络舆情指标体系构建研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(5): 93-99.
[14]	杨天剑，左欣. 电信供应链的采购期权契约设计与协调机制研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(3): 10-15.
[15]	孙湘湘，周小亮. 风险投资的地区差异及其影响因素——以广东省为例[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社科版), 2019, 21(3): 25-32.